My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PL PACKET 09191995
StAnthony
>
Parks & Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
1995
>
PL PACKET 09191995
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2015 5:30:43 PM
Creation date
12/30/2015 5:30:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
20
SP Folder Name
PL PACKETS 1995
SP Name
PL PACKET 09191995
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
157
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CHAPTER 2 LAND USE 11 <br /> possible in appropriate locations and the careful treatment of the edges where residential land <br /> use abuts non-residential land uses. Concentrating non-residential development, and in <br /> particular avoiding spot zoning and strip development patterns, minimizes the number of <br /> residential/non-residential edges that occur. Where they do occur, landscaping, careful site <br /> design, special height restrictions and setback requirements, among other things, can be used <br /> to protect residential properties. <br /> The effects of traffic can be somewhat controlled by locating land uses so higher volume <br /> traffic. generators are closest to major streets. In this way, traffic can be kept off local, <br /> residential streets. In many areas, residential uses will have to be located next to major <br /> streets. In these cases, the possible negative effects of the location can be minimized though <br /> site planning techniques such as increased setbacks, and location of open space adjacent to <br /> the roadway. The particular problem of freeway noise has been dealt with through <br /> construction of noise abatement barriers. One technique that should not be used is to <br /> uniformly locate apartments in undesirable areas, such as adjacent to freeways. Particular <br /> building types, such as apartments, should not be thought of as a buffer use in less desirable <br /> areas, though it may occur that they are appropriate uses in some instances. <br /> Consistent with the desire that apartments should not be located in inferior areas, is the <br /> desire that these areas not be inferior in their architectural or site design. While the intent is <br /> that these developments should not be excessively costly and loaded with unused facilities, <br /> they should provide for the basic open space and recreation needs of their residents. Usable <br /> open space and tot lots should be minimum requirements for apartment developments. <br /> A major objective of this plan as it relates to residential land uses is the provision of <br /> opportunities for the development of a variety of housing types in a variety of price ranges. <br /> The present housing stock provides this diversity through the present mix of older and newer <br /> single family homes, duplexes, apartments, townhouses and mobile homes. A function of <br /> this plan is to maintain this diversity in the development of new areas. This is proposed to <br /> be done through development of the larger parcels as planned residential developments ' <br /> (PRD). Through the PRD, a variety of structure types and lot sizes can be allowed as part <br /> of a single development having significant open space. A density bonus is also offered for <br /> development under this procedure as an incentive for conformance to City goals such as <br /> provision of amenities, protection of natural areas and conformance to housing goals. <br /> Part of the present diversity in the housing stock exists because of the large number of <br /> smaller homes and lots in the older eastern part of the community. This area is dominated <br /> by lots which are 5,000 square feet in area and 40 to 50 feet in width. They provide a <br /> reservoir of modestly-priced, affordable housing, which is an important community asset. <br /> The existing and proposed amounts of residential land use by acreage is graphically <br /> portrayed in Figures lA and 1B. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.