My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PL PACKET 05162000
StAnthony
>
Parks & Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
2000
>
PL PACKET 05162000
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2015 7:36:38 PM
Creation date
12/30/2015 7:36:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
27
SP Folder Name
PL PACKETS 2000-2004
SP Name
PL PACKET 05162000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
165
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes <br /> April 18, 2000 <br /> Page 8 _ <br /> 1 Regarding a development review committee,Momson requested that Mr.Carlson inform him of the <br /> 2 members of the committee. Mr.Carlson suggested members of the Planning Commission,plus City <br /> 3 Staff, but would confirm that suggestion with Momson upon further inquiry. <br /> 4 Hanson confirmed that a developers agreement would be entered into if the City Council approved <br /> 5 the PUD. <br /> 6 Thomas confirmed that the PUD would allow for Hillcrest to begin the redevelopment of the Apache <br /> 7 Plaza, but would continue to allow the City to obtain public input on how the rest of the property <br /> 8 would be developed. <br /> 9 Mr. Carlson responded that the PUD could be phrased as strict or as lenient as the City deemed <br /> 10 appropriate. <br /> 11 Mr. Jones stated his belief the importance of viewing the entire parcel as a PUD. <br /> 12 Bergstrom asked DSU and City Staff to work together to arrive at a reasonable minimum standard. <br /> 13 Hanson expressed his impression that the purpose of the PUD would be to allow Hillcrest to develop <br /> 14 inside a box,so to speak,but that the City would have input regarding the development of the outlots <br /> in the future. He.expressed his belief that such language should be incorporated into the PUD or <br /> 16 developers agreement. <br /> 17 Bergstrom responded that since Hillcrest is unsure about the particular development of the outlots <br /> 18 for the future, it would be an excellent idea to incorporate language to cover all aspects. <br /> 19 Momson agreed that the City should consider all of the property that Hillcrest owns when devel- <br /> -20 oping the'PUD. Additionally,Morrison stated that if Hillcrest were at some,point_to relinquish the <br /> 21 property back to US Bank, the potential for subdivision of the property would be an issue. <br /> 22 Mr.Gleekel addressed the Commission and explained the process.that Hillcrest Development would <br /> 23 be starting and the issues that would be addressed in the application. <br /> 24 Mr. Tankenoff addressed the Commission and stated that his goal as coordinator of the process is <br /> 25 to determine and consider the concerns that the residents around Silver Lake have,as well as work <br /> 26 with Rice Creek about stormwater runoff. <br /> 27 Mr. Tankenoff reconfirmed that an introductory meeting had been held with the Silver Lake <br /> 28 Homeowners Association and he anticipated continued meetings. He wondered if there were other <br /> 29 neighborhoods or associations that had concerns and,if so,he would be prepared to meet with them <br /> 30 as well. <br /> 31 Bergstrom acknowledged that Mr. Tankenoff has done an excellent job of due diligence and in- <br /> 32 forming the residents,City Council,Planning Commission and the community of the progress with <br /> 33 the redevelopment of Apache Plaza. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.