Laserfiche WebLink
Parks Commission Meeting Minutes 27 <br /> May 1, 2000 <br /> Page 3 <br /> 1 The following was discussed regarding lighting for the basketball court and the trail: <br /> 2 There was considerable discussion regarding the placement.of the lights. Jindra suggested they, <br /> 3 install a basketball light and see if it is necessary to install another light for the trail. Hartman <br /> 4 suggested they install all the lights at one time. <br /> 5 Bob Kost, BRW, Inc. suggested they consider where they would like lights placed in the park, so <br /> 6 they do not end up with shoe box fixture lights throughout the park, which are not neighborhood <br /> 7 friendly. He suggested a light for the basketball court be put in between the building and the . <br /> 8 fence so it is not a visual nuisance. As they look at the rest of Central Park they could bring in <br /> 9 other designs of light fixtures. <br /> 10 Koehntop suggested the color of the lights match the color of lights already in the park. <br /> 1 l Hartman stated two lights would be put in, one for the basketball court and a security light for the <br /> 12 trail on the east side. This will be done within one month, along with two garbage cans that will <br /> 13 be placed accordingly. <br /> Central Park Redevelopment was discussed as follows: <br /> 15 Mr. Kost reviewed a flow chart of the process for the reconstruction of Central Park. He <br /> 16 reviewed key decisions for the Park Commission and the City Council and the amount of time <br /> 17 the decisions might take. He explained they have been in the planning process for two years, and <br /> 18 he has now taken the proposal prepared a couple months ago and laid out the steps of the project <br /> 19 across a series of months. He identified the series of steps from A to I, starting with a final <br /> 20 survey and ending with construction. The decision that plays in is whether the Commission <br /> 21 wants to complete the whole park in one construction swoop or in phases, and what will drive <br /> 22 that is funds. He noted that as the process continues additional things arise and the price keeps <br /> 23 going up. <br /> 24 Jindra asked how the development can be accomplished in pieces. Mr. Kost responded they are <br /> 25 now preparing the design development plan, after that is completed it must be approved along <br /> 26 with the phasing options. He has timed the plan aggressively, however it can take more time if <br /> 27 the Commission would like. He advised to accomplish the plan in phases they can do all the <br /> 28 field work,then do trail work,then do the playground,then do batting cages. This could take up <br /> 29 to two or three years and additional money could be saved to complete amenities. He explained <br /> 30 they would only want to disrupt facilities and take fields out of operation once. Sports Boosters <br /> 31 and schools will need time to make arrangements for the time when the fields are out of <br /> 32 commission. <br /> S stated he liked the idea of two phases and hoped the loss of the fields could be kept to a <br /> Gamey sta P <br /> 34 minimal time of one year. Mr. Kost advised the fields need a season to establish. They could <br />