My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PL PACKET 06192001
StAnthony
>
Parks & Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
2001
>
PL PACKET 06192001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2015 7:40:46 PM
Creation date
12/30/2015 7:40:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
27
SP Folder Name
PL PACKETS 2000-2004
SP Name
PL PACKET 06192001
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
137
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
' � ' i1 IMPLEMENTATION <br /> development proposals within the Heart of the A. INTRODUCTION B. DESIGN REVIEW p p p City <br /> district. The design review process could be tal- <br /> This framework recommends distinct strategies for The recommended method for administering design lored to fit within the City's development review pro- <br /> cedures In man <br /> guiding the Heart of the City district's future form guidelines is to establish a Design Review Advisory y ways.The p rocess,however,should <br /> and appearance, Before describing the specific Committee and Incorporate design review as a stan- involve the following basic steps; <br /> recommendations, understand that the current dard step in the development review process. 1. Publish a Summary Users Guide and <br /> development pattern In Burnsville evolved over <br /> many decades. Likewise, realization of this Mission of the Design Review Checklist <br /> The design review crtteda and procedures should <br /> frameworKs vision for the Heart of the City will take Committee <br /> several years. be summarized in a brochure and made avail- <br /> The mission of the Design Review Committee Is to able to the general public to facilitate under- <br /> The City made a concerted effort to involve a review each public and private development pro- standing of the process. A checklist of submis- <br /> broad cross-section of the community In all phases posal within the Heart of the City district for compli- sion requirements also should be created and <br /> of this project. Business owners, residents, com- ance with the intent of the site design,architectural, Included in the summary brochure. <br /> munity leaders,and elected and appointed off I- landscape and streetscape design guidelines estab- <br /> lished in this Design Framework. 2. Informal Review <br /> cials have all contributed greatyto this study.Suc- An informal review of the proposed protect <br /> s e Implementation will require each of these The Design Review Committee will consist of IndMdu- should be conducted between the Design Re- <br /> the of the community to remain Involved in g <br /> the process.Zoning enforcement and design stan- als appointed by the City and include representa- view Committee and the developer during the <br /> dards will not succeed without the cooperation tives of the Heart of the City Steering and Special preliminary design stage. This pre-application <br /> and commitment of landowners, development District Committees, City Staff, a design consultant, meeting Is an opportunity for all parties to com- <br /> interests, and the rest of the community and a representative of the development group se- municate the expectations,attributes, and is- <br /> lected as a master developer. The review process sues Involved In the project before a great deal <br /> conducted by this Committee will be separate from of design time and dollars are Invested. <br /> the City Staff's development review and approval <br /> process. 3. Staff Analysis <br /> Refined site, building and landscaping plans <br /> The Design Review Process should be submitted to the Design Review Com- <br /> To ensure that the design guidelines are administered mittee for review to ensure they meet the zon- <br /> in a fair and consistent manner,the review process Ing,building code,and design guideline crite- <br /> should be administered In a step-by-step process, rla. A brief review report that describes how <br /> emphasizing collaboration and avoiding adversarial the proposal does or does not meet the crite- <br /> relationships. rla should be produced, The checklist should <br /> be used at this point to ensure continuity in the <br /> The design review process should be adopted as a review procedures. <br /> standard step In the review of all public and private <br /> - f <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.