My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC PACKET 05111982
StAnthony
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
1982
>
CC PACKET 05111982
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2015 3:47:22 PM
Creation date
12/30/2015 3:47:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
16
SP Folder Name
CC PACKETS 1981-1984 & 1987
SP Name
CC PACKET 05111982
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
103
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I <br /> CITY OF ST. ANTHONY <br /> REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION <br /> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ <br /> iDate Submitted Type of Action Requested Agenda Item Number <br /> Resolution <br /> May 5, 19.82 Ordinance Unfinished Bus i Hess-3 <br /> Date 'Action Requested Formal Action/Motion Title Consideration of <br /> X <br /> Other <br /> May 11 , 1982 Insurance Bids <br /> f <br /> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ <br /> TO: Mayor and Councilmen <br /> I <br /> FROM: David M. Childs , City Manager <br /> --------------------------------------------------------------- ---- <br /> SUMMARY DISCUSSION OF SUBJECT: As you recal 1 , we advertised for bids on City <br /> insurance to be opened on Monday, May 10, 1982 at 10:00 A.M. As of the date of this <br /> memo I expect only two major bidders (the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance <br /> Trust and the Home Insurance Company) . <br /> • FISCAL IMPACT: Competitive bidding of insurance can and has resulted in substan- <br /> tial savings. Another factor which can have along-term effect on stabilizing costs <br /> is to do just the opposite and inform bidder that if costs remain reasonable, we do <br /> not expect to rebid for three years. We are attempting to use both of '\these <br /> strategies in our process this year. <br /> ALTERNATIVES : To be submitted May 1 1 , 1982. <br /> i <br /> i <br /> RECOMMENDATION: To be submitted May 1 1 , 1982. <br /> • CITY MANAGER' S REVIEW: COMMENTS : <br /> t <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.