My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC PACKET 08231983
StAnthony
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
1983
>
CC PACKET 08231983
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2015 3:52:02 PM
Creation date
12/30/2015 3:51:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
16
SP Folder Name
CC PACKETS 1981-1984 & 1987
SP Name
CC PACKET 08231983
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
100
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
-5- <br /> (2)- . Denying the request might place TCF in a competitive disadvantage <br /> • <br /> with other banking institutions who are not restricted as to the <br /> signage when advertising the. new."electronic developments in their <br /> field of enterprise. <br /> Voting on the motion: <br /> Aye : Bowerman, Wagner, and Franzese. <br /> Nay: Makowske. <br /> Abstention: Bjorklund <br /> Motion carried. <br /> The Manager indicated the Metro Council would be preparing a work <br /> program for the City's Capital Improvement Plan and as well as a housing <br /> plan for which there would be no charge. <br /> Steve Yurick of Arkell Development and Gary Tushie of Saunders-Thalden <br /> Architects were present to report the revised proposal for the con= <br /> dominium structure to be built under Phase 1 of the Kenzie Terrace <br /> Redevelopment Project for which they were seeking an amendment -to .the. <br /> Phase 1 Detailed P..U.D. Plan. Commission members were provided <br /> copies of the site and elevation plans and a solar graph . showing the <br /> effect of the higher building on the adjoining - property was presented <br /> at the .meeting. The original plans had been revised to provide two <br /> levels of -parking, or one enclosed parking space per unit, because a <br /> market survey of 114 persons who had indicated an interest in buying <br /> into the project had convinced the developers that the project would <br /> probably be marketable with .only a one for one ratio -of .parking. The <br /> architect had redrawn the plans to provide an extra level of parking, <br /> one-quarter. underground and three-quarters above ground, which, with <br /> the four levels of condominiums.,- would result in a 5-1/2. story building <br /> as compared to the 4-1/2 story structure approved- for the P.U.D. In <br /> his letter to the four residents whose homes are directly behind the <br /> project property , -which was hand delivered by the Manager that day, <br /> Mr. Childs had told them the height of the structure would .now be <br /> 49 feet to the eaves of the pitch roof . Mr. Yurick confirmed that <br /> would change the height to 64. feet at the peak. <br /> Only one of the four property, owners .was present for the discussion <br /> that evening. Bernice Basara who lives directly behind the body shop <br /> parcel at 2608 - 27th Avenue N.E. indicated she was in favor of homes <br /> being. constructed on the site since "they would be better than what's <br /> there now" . Her only concern was that the higher building wouldn' t <br /> increase the shading of the alley in the winter, which becomes so <br /> icy . drivin.g is difficult. Mr,. Tushie ..showed her on the solar graphs <br /> that the shadows cast by the building at their lowest point in early <br /> winter would never extend as far as those cast by the 30 foot ever- <br /> greens. just across the .alley from her property. <br /> The. Manager..had -talked to "firs'. Wehr` who`lives on the end of that block <br /> and sh.e' had not indicated -any major: problems with the 'revised proposal. <br /> When .Commissioner B.jorklund. asked. Mrs ' Basara if she. knew why the - other <br /> .neighbors weren't at the .meet n,g that-..evening,, she. told him Mr. Frederick <br /> had. died Monday and' she didn' t know what the other neighbor 's reaction <br /> towards the development would be. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.