CC PACKET 02141984 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

r_, -4- (2) The proprietors must comply with all state laws relating to • obscenity and. to any ordinance of the City of St. Anthony there- after relating to obscenity. (3) Conviction of the owner or any of the employees of the owner for -violation of obscenity laws in the operation of the store would . be grounds for revocation of this permit .by the City Council. (4). Traffic flow information signage be installed at the direction of the City Manager. On granting this permit, the Council finds, as did the Planning Com- mission, that: (A) - The proposed use is one of the conditional uses specifically permitted in the district in which it is located. (B) The proposed conditional .use would not be detrimental to the health , safety, or general welfare of persons residing or , working in the vicinity or injurious to the property ..values or improvements in the vicinity._ (C) The ..proposed. conditional use is possibly necessary .or .possibly. desirable at 'the 'specified location' to provide a service or a facility which is in the interest of public convenience and may contribute to the general welfare of the neighborhood or community . (D) There was no- opposition to the _.permit_..demonstrated. during the hearings before the Planning Commission or Council. Motion carried unanimously. The Commission representative read the minutes which reported the dif- ferences between the Walbon counsel .and. the abutting neighbor to the west of the property located Iat the southwest corner of 33rd Avenue N.E. and Old Highway 8 for which Irving Walbon was seeking a subdivision-. without platting. Many of these points of contention were again aired by Robert Halva, representing Mr. Walbon, and Violet Dorumsgaard, 3612 - 33rd Avenue N.E. , who indicated she "would rather give $2 ,000 to Mr. Walbon than to an attorney to represent her in the difference" . Mr. Soth said he wasn' t sure how much the costs would be for splitting the Walbon. property into three parcels in order. that Mrs . .Dorums-gaard . . could either buy-.or trade two easterly feet of -her own property for. the 469.29 square feet which lies in front of her picture window. He. advised the Council that Hennepin County-would have to ..approve any splitting of Torrance property and would probably disapprove if the split resulted in a property description which was too complicated, which Mr. Soth is. certain ,the City .wouldn' t -want either. This, the Attorhey .said, might well .be the case if 'the. interior lot line were .angled to produce two buildable lots after the triangle is- removed to • straighten out Mrs. Dorumsgaard' s property. :- In any event,' the City