My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC PACKET 05221984
StAnthony
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
1984
>
CC PACKET 05221984
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2015 3:56:59 PM
Creation date
12/30/2015 3:56:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
16
SP Folder Name
CC PACKETS 1981-1984 & 1987
SP Name
CC PACKET 05221984
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
101
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
t <br /> i <br /> -3- <br /> • 1 There was� no one present to speak .either for or against. the proposal, <br /> 2 and ,the Chairman closed the hearing at 8:02 P.M. , for the Commission- <br /> 3 consideration and action. <br /> 4 - <br /> 5 Motion,.by .Commissioner Bjorklund and seconded by Commissioner Jones- to. <br /> 6 recommend the Council grant a one foot sideyard setback variance which <br /> 7 would allow Mike Pribula - to construct the single family dwelling he <br /> 8 proposes on the vacant lot at 3231 Roosevelt Street N.E, , finding that: <br /> 9 <br /> 10 1. The proponent had developed a proposal which would conform to the <br /> 11 wishes of his neighbor to the south related to the placement of <br /> 12 his garage. <br /> 13 <br /> 14 2 . There was no other opposition from adjoining property owners. <br /> 15 <br /> 16 3. Several lots and homes of the same size have been developed on that <br /> 17 street. <br /> 18 <br /> 19 4. The unique characteristics - of this lot with the extended shape and <br /> 20 no street address would appear to constitute a hardship for the <br /> 21 applicant to . construct his home according to the Ordinance requirements ., ll <br /> 22 <br /> 23 Motion carried unanimously. <br /> 24 <br /> 25 At 8 :07 P.M. , Chairman Zawislak opened the hearing to consider a petition. <br /> 26 from Edwin and Alyce Brown for a variance to the City Zoning Ordinance - <br /> 27 requirements which would allow them to reconstruct. their home at. 2702 <br /> 28 33rd Avenue N.E which was severely damaged in the April tornado, with <br /> 29 an entryway which would be two feet closer to Belden Drive than its <br /> 30 existing distance of 14 . 2 feet. He read the notice which had been <br /> 31 Published June 6th ,-and mailed to all adjoining property owners of <br /> 32 record within 200 feet of the subject property. No one present reported <br /> 33 failure to receive that notice or objected to its content and the <br /> 34 Manager reported receiving no objections to the request. <br /> 35 <br /> 36 Gary Brown, 1317 Hillside Circle, Chaska, -MN, who had accompanied his <br /> 37 parents to the meeting, presented their request, saying they wanted to <br /> 38 replace the old entryway with another which would be two feet longer <br /> 39 and which would not be' so steep. The Manager confirmed that this would <br /> 40 require a two foot variance from the setbacks established when the home <br /> 41 was built long before Belden Drive was constructed. In his June - 15th <br /> 42 memorandum, ' Mr. Childs - had recommended the variance be approved .per- <br /> 43 ceiving that the existing corner lot which is only 42 . 2 feet wide could <br /> 44 not accommodate a standard size house, anyway, and said there are <br /> 45 several other substandard lots and homes- in the same block which were <br /> 46 also grandfathered. in with the City Zoning Ordinance. <br /> 47, <br /> 48 The applicants ' son assured Commissioner Jones that the existing driveway <br /> 49 .ended 'at the front door and that there would be no objections to having <br /> 50 it removed if 'there was a concern that it might be used to drive around . <br /> 51 the house.. The new garage fronts on Belden, he added. .. . <br /> •53 Commissioner. Jones indicated he perceives the reconstructed- home- would <br /> 54 be a real asset to the neighborhood and he believes this to be just <br /> 55 another- instance of where the extra setback size. required for. corner <br /> 56 lots is not necessary. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.