My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC PACKET 05221984
StAnthony
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
1984
>
CC PACKET 05221984
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2015 3:56:59 PM
Creation date
12/30/2015 3:56:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
16
SP Folder Name
CC PACKETS 1981-1984 & 1987
SP Name
CC PACKET 05221984
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
101
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
4) on a relative basis the site location is situated in close.proximity to <br /> • desirable community services such as shopping, transit, parks and <br /> health services; and <br /> 5) design information supports a judgment that the project will be safe, <br /> accessible and psychologically supportive for residents. <br /> The following table shows how each application was rated. <br /> Ser- Spon- Ser- <br /> vice sor vice <br /> Referral First Aware- Capa- Prox- <br /> Number Project - Community Elderly ness bility mitt' Design Total <br /> 12135-1 Northwest Metro Hsg.- 1 1 1 1 1 5 <br /> Rogers <br /> 12136-1 Woodhaven - Edina 0 1 1 1 1 4 <br /> 12137-1 Walker on Kenzie <br /> St. Anthony <br /> 12138-1 Addition to Red Rock 0 1 1 0 1 3 <br /> Manor - Newport <br /> 12139-1 Little Crow Elderly 0 1 1/2 0 1 2-1/2 <br /> Housing - St. Paul <br /> A ranking is reached by grouping the projects that were awarded the same <br /> number of points (beginning with the highest number of points awarded) and <br /> • listing them within groups according to the appropriateness of the size of each <br /> proposal relative to the Allocation Plan elderly housing goal for the site <br /> community. Of course, any proposals found to be in conflict with Council <br /> policies will be deleted from the final priority ranking. <br /> The ranking based an points awarded and the status relative to the community's <br /> Allocation Plan goal for housing of the elderly is as follows: <br /> Number of <br /> Units Over <br /> Referral Points Elderly <br /> Rank Number Project Name-Units Proposed Awarded Goal <br /> 1 12135-1 Northwest Metro Housing - 24 5 N/A <br /> 1 12137-1 Walker on Kenzie - 45 5 37 <br /> 3 12136-1 Woodhaven - 38 4 51 <br /> 4 12138-1 Red Rock Manor - 24 3 22 <br /> 5 12139-1 Little Crow - 35 2.S within <br /> The final factor to be evaluated is community efforts in support of assisted <br /> housing for low- and moderate-income families. Family housing achievements are <br /> considered because the Council's Subsidized Housing Review Guidelines require <br /> that funding of housing for the elderly should only be awarded to communities <br /> that have made significant efforts to achieve the goals for assisted family <br /> housing specified for therm in the Allocation Plan. Significant effort is <br /> defined as the achievement of a community's current or previous Allocation Plan <br /> goal or the submission of an acceptable plan to achieve the current Allocation <br /> Plan goal . Since only Me of the anticipated housing assistance funding has <br /> actually been committed during the 1980-83 Allocation Plan period, however, <br /> this standard will be applied for the current period. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.