CC PACKET 07241984 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

-3- After Mr. Root requested a- clarification on. the watershed-- .the Planning Commission' s -consensus was that they did-: not feel the. • drainage will change. Commissioner Bjorklund perceives--that .any addition, with - or without & variance, would increase the runoff . Commissioner Bjorklund queried Mr. Root about his own interpretation of a bay. Mr. Root indicated he believes a bay must be curved and should not be more than 250 of the width of 'the dwelling. The Chairman .asked Mr. Root if the proposed structure was disturbing to him because, as a neighbor, it would have windows in it and Mr. Root answered windows had nothing to do.with his objection and that he objects to the structure itself being too close to his property line . He went on to say he feels the building codes should be adhered to and by granting variances , we allow people to build anything they want. He feels strongly he he has the right to object to a variance from the building code. Mr. Root also stated he was not only speaking for himself and had obtained the signatures of other neighbors who are against the proposal. No other persons present, however, spoke against the proposal . Before Pat DeKanick began to speak for the proposal, the Planning Commission requested an exact measurement. of the proposed structure . Mr. DeKanick indicated, in response, that 12 feet would be added on to the existing house, plus 2 feet additional for the porch, for a total of 14 feet overall . Mrs . DeKanick then read from law books the basis of variances . She • ,stated that she feels tha-t--M-r-.-. ,Root obviously -does not understand variances . In the book, under zoning changes , it showed that vari- an,ces allow the individual=.-landowner to deviate somewhat - from zoning code requirements and variances do not require a zoning change. However, the variance must not change the basic characteristics of the neighborhood, according to the law book. The applicant also commented on Mr. Root ' s concern about the drainage problem. She said at the time Mr. Root built his house he was aware of the water problem. Mrs . DeKanick also stated that when they (DeKanick ' s) built their house in 1959 , they were the first new house on that side of the block . In 1961 the house to the north was built a little bit higher than the DeKanick ' s since the ground level for that house is built up. She feels that as the first people on the block, they are not causing the drainage problems - and she also cited other neighbors with water problems . The Chairman asked if there were any other questions . Commissioner Bjorklund read the section of the Ordinance regarding permitted encroachments, which may come within 3 feet of the property line . He perceived the DeKanick' s held to that regulation. However, the following several sections of the Ordinance state that certain en- croachments may not be within 5 feet of the property line , the Commissioner continued. He .then asked Mrs . DeKanick what she felt the width of a bay should- be. She stated her interpretation of the ordinance is that it could be any size, however, she .does not feel it should be as large as .25 -feet, but did not� feel 12-15 feet to be • excessive. Commissioner Bjorklund also asked. why the original plans , which indi- cated the proposed structure would extend 16 feet back from the