Laserfiche WebLink
5 <br /> 1 . <br /> acknowledged -that there was a dock on that side: but 'said . <br /> 2 by doing,*that-,. •the • trailer would not be next to-:the . resi-. <br /> 3 dence on Chandler Drive; <br /> 4 was told by the firm president- the building'-s address is , <br /> 5 Chandler Drive and even though ,there might be an access <br /> 6 on the far south side of the building, the Chandler Road- <br /> 7 access would be easier in the winter; <br /> 8 Hansen was told -the distance the trailer could -be -sited <br /> 9 -from the building would depend on the type of wall <br /> 10 materials used and that the codes would be checked <br /> 11 regarding that point before a building permit would- be <br /> 12 issued; <br /> 13 questioned why the request had not reflected the firm' s <br /> 14 intent of moving when the lease expired in October; <br /> 15 was told by Mr. LeVahn that, with the kind of rents <br /> 16 Gelco charged, there was little chance the trailer <br /> 17 would be left on the site once Minnesota Scientific had <br /> 18 moved-. <br /> 9 Wingard was told by Mr. LeVahn that the existing ash . <br /> 0 tree should not be disturbed when the trailer is put in <br /> 21 place and that any sod which is damaged, would be re-. <br /> 22 placed when his firm moves. <br /> 23 Franzese was told by Mr. Childs that he had been unable <br /> 24 to find records for specific permits for similar uses <br /> 25 although he recalled a request for a trailer next to. <br /> 26 Central Engineering while that firm' s building was <br /> 27 being expanded and that the trailer Elmwood Church had <br /> 28 indicated they needed during construction had never been <br /> 29 put on that site. <br /> 30 Neighbor <br /> 31 Concerns: Bi11 Graff , 3824 Foss Road N.E. ; indicated his only: con- <br /> 32 cern was that when Minnesota Scientific moved out of <br /> 33 that the trailer be removed at the same time; <br /> 34 added, however, that - since Mr. LeVahn had assured the <br /> 3'S Commission that would- be done; he•* would not .be against <br /> 36 the City granting the permit. <br /> 37 No other persons were present to provide further input and the Chair . <br /> 3$ closed the hearing•'at 8 : 03 P.M'.. : for Commission consideration of .a <br /> 39 recommendation 'to the Council. <br /> • <br />