Laserfiche WebLink
MEMORANDUM <br /> DATE: August 21 , 1987 <br /> TO: Mayor and Councilmembers <br /> FROM: David M. Childs, City Manager. <br /> ITEM: PARKVIEW BUILDING PURCHASE <br /> In early ' 1987 officials from School District #282 and the <br /> City began discussions relative to the transfer of the <br /> Parkview facility to the City. This was in conjunction with <br /> cost saving measures by the School to move their Parkview- <br /> based operations to the High School building. <br /> After considerable negotiations; it appeared we had reached <br /> tentative agreement, which would provide for. such a transfer <br /> in ownership. The School at that time was reluctant to give <br /> the building to the City at no cost generally, because there <br /> are New Brighton taxpayers in ISD 282 who need to be assured <br /> that they are getting proper return on their tax dollars. <br /> However, since in " the remainder of the district the taxes <br /> paid -to the City or School are from the same local taxpayers, <br /> there should be no need for exchanging dollars relative -to <br /> exchanging ownership. Since the School had no money for a <br /> needed parking lot and playground and they wanted to free up <br /> some of their custodial staff to do the remodeling work at <br /> the High School, it was tentatively agreed that the City <br /> would construct a parking lot; small play area and maintain <br /> the outside of the school grounds for two summers . At the <br /> request of the School, the City prepared a purchase agreement <br /> to that effect. <br /> About this time, however, the School received estimates which <br /> showed their total cost to move from Parkview at about <br /> $273 ,000 (estimates are attached) . Since the School has <br /> about $63 ,000 available over the next three years, they ' came <br /> back to the City to .explain their need to get $210 ,000 from <br /> the:' City. in-Order to be able 'to sell the building. <br /> I reported this turn of 'events to the City Council, who <br /> responded that at $70 , 000 - - $80 ,000 in cost to the City, <br /> much of which would have been in kind and- ."forced account" <br /> . services the decision to take over the building made a lot of <br /> sense -on its own merit. When talking about a $210 ,000 cash- <br /> outlay, however , the Council felt that a more careful look at <br /> the City' s costs was needed prior to making a .purchase <br /> decision. <br />