CC PACKET 11101987 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

tip Z" l . - In response to the Commission concerns about whether the ponding area 2 ,'*would - provide adequate drainage for the area,. Mr._ Childs suggested 3 their recommendation, be made subject to. the City reviewing all 4 drainage and utility -.plans. . . 5 He also indicated a traffic engineer would be consulted within the 6 next two weeks regarding- the adequacy of the access road to the 7 project off Kenzie Terrace- so the siting - of the pedestrian signal 8 could be finalized to meet CDBG funding deadlines. . 9 10 The hearing was closed at 8 : 30 P.M. for the following motion: 11 Motion by Wagner, seconded - by Werenicz to recommend to the Council = 12 that the Planned Unit Development-Concept and Detailed Plan, adopted 13 in November, 1986, for the final—phases of the Kenzie Terrace 14 Redevelopment Project be amended to accept the plans dated November 3 , 15 1987 , which were presented by the-- Gaughan Companies during the 16 Commission' s November 4 , 1987 hearing to include the granting of a 17 four unit per acre density variance for the revised site plan which 18 provides for 28 units per acre where- the Zoning Ordinance requires 24. . 19 ' and a 7 foot height variance to the City' s Ordinance provision for 20 buildings no higher than 35 feet, which would allow the proposed , 21 structures to be a little over 42 feet high from grade to roof peak. 22 The Commission further recommends that: 23 *the Council stipulate that drainage and utility . features of the �. 24 plan be reviewed by the City before finalization of 25 *a traffic specialist be consulted to -assure adequate and safe 26 vehicle facility . access to the project; 27 *the August plans dealing with basic structure exteriors. and grade . 28 elevations, which were not included in the Commission agenda 29 packet become a reference for final approval. 30 The Council is also recommended to adopt the following additions to . 31 the plans: 32 *a second access for emergency vehicles through the parking lot as 33 proposed by the developers; 34 *City Ordinance prohibition of unnecessary storage on balcony 35 balconies; 36 *walkways from Coolidge -Street and from Kenzie. Terrace through the 37 project to the shopping center as proposed by the developers for 38 the convenience of the area residents; 39 *a restriction of construction between 7 : 00- A.M. and 7 : 00 P.M. to 40 avoid unnecessary disruption of the neighborhood. 4