My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC PACKET 05241988
StAnthony
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
1988
>
CC PACKET 05241988
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2015 4:29:59 PM
Creation date
12/30/2015 4:29:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
18
SP Folder Name
CC PACKETS 1987-1989
SP Name
CC PACKET 05241988
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
106
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 *these persons wanted to know how much interest there was on the <br /> 2 Council to involve the City in a joint City/School District #282 <br /> 3 Community Services management; • <br /> 4 *some of the incidents involving the use of the Wilshire Park School <br /> 5 had reduced the level of trust between the parents and the School <br /> 6 Board; <br /> 7 *she found the differences in figures quoted by the City and School <br /> 8 District officials to be very confusing. <br /> 9 The resident was told: <br /> 10 *the predecessor to the Community Services, which was known as the <br /> it Parks and Recreation Department, had been under the auspices of the <br /> 12 City until those programs were expanded to include educational <br /> 13 classes and the school decided to take over the programs; <br /> 14 *some of the candidates for the School Board appeared to be under <br /> 15 the mistaken impression that Community Services Daycare programs <br /> 16 were paid for by the state when, except for programs paid for by <br /> 17 special grants, they are all paid for by St. Anthony taxpayers and <br /> 18 with users fees; <br /> 19 *the Early Childhood program had been . one for which Tom McMullen, who <br /> 20 was especially good at that sort of thing, had gotten a grant which <br /> 21 is no longer available, leaving a program no one wants dropped; <br /> 22 *there is a perception that the reason the City's child care costs• <br /> 23 are so much lower than similar programs in other locations is <br /> 24 because the school is subsidizing those -costs for both resident and <br /> 25 non-resident users; <br /> 26 *the Council had agreed to initiate discussions of a joint City/ <br /> 27 School Community Services which the School Board had proposed. <br /> 28 Mr. Childs indicated he perceived there had to be a distinction made <br /> 29 between community education and what's commonly thought of as parks <br /> 30 and recreation programs. He said the City is qualified to run the <br /> 31 latter because that involves cutting grass, taking care of the ball <br /> 32 diamonds and things of that sort which the City employees normally do, <br /> 33 but the City is not qualified to run educational programs. The <br /> 34 Manager said it was his understanding that the day care programs had <br /> 35 started as a part of the continuum in education philosophy that <br /> 36 education should be an ongoing process where everybody would be <br /> 37 involved in the school system from infancy through the years after <br /> 38 retirement. Cities have traditionally resisted involvement in <br /> 39 educational programs although St. Anthony had perceived supporting <br /> 40 the Chemical Abuse Information Committee and Youth Service Bureau <br /> 41 might be somewhat tied in with the services offered by the Police <br /> 42 Department. <br /> 15 • <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.