My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC PACKET 11171999
StAnthony
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
1999
>
CC PACKET 11171999
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2015 4:10:42 PM
Creation date
12/30/2015 4:10:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
17
SP Folder Name
CC PACKETS 1999-2001
SP Name
CC PACKET 11171999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
109
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Housing and Redevelopment Authority Meeting Minutes <br /> November 9, 1999 <br /> Page 4 • <br /> 1 Mr. Horst stated that the merchants have been involved in the discussions about landscaping, and <br /> 2 was under the impression that mostly bushes would be planted,as opposed to tall trees that would <br /> 3 obscure the view of the businesses. <br /> 4 Faust restated his suggestion about incorporating a minimum assessment agreement so that the <br /> 5 City would be protected in the future and would be able to retain the tax rate if the property sold. <br /> 6 Furthermore, he suggested that the agreement incorporate language that would require the Center <br /> 7 owners to agree to an amount that the property was worth in order to receive TIF financing. <br /> 8 Ranallo expressed concern about item nos. 12 and 13 of the Letter of Understanding and inquired <br /> 9 if those items could be eliminated. He supported the Plan, and agreed with Marks about the <br /> 10 possibility of moving the gazebo to a quieter spot, but he.was reluctant to tie a future City <br /> 11 Council with the situations posed in items 12 and 13. <br /> 12 Morrison clarified that the items specify "negotiations" and that the City would not be,committed <br /> 13 to following through with any sale that is not desired. <br /> 14 Ranallo requested that City Attorney Bill Soth review the Letter of Understanding. Morrison <br /> 15 replied that Mr. Soth has reviewed the Letter, and clarified that this is more of a policy issue up <br /> 16 to the City. ' <br /> 17 Thuesen stated that he respected Ranallo's hesitation about item nos. 12 and 13, but he believed <br /> 18 that the City would benefit from keeping those items in place and exploring those issues. He <br /> 19 would be reluctant to limit the City's options by excluding the issues presented in item nos. 12 <br /> 20 and 13. <br /> 21 Marks agreed with Thuesen and believed that the way item nos, 12 and 13 were written, that a <br /> 22 future Council would not be tied into any course of action. He felt that those issues provided an <br /> 23 opportunity to negotiate. Marks stressed that he believed the project as a whole should move <br /> 24 ahead with all due speed. <br /> 25 Cavanaugh disagreed because, he stated, there is a sum of money available until the end of the <br /> 26 year that is driving the agenda for the redevelopment. He believed there are unresolved issues. <br /> 27 Morrison acknowledged that the pace is fast; however, if the funds available are not allocated by <br /> 28 the end of this.year, it could be more difficult to put the plan together and arrange for alternative <br /> 29 funding. <br /> 30 Ranallo suggested that he felt the public would want to be aware of potential changes, such as <br /> 31 moving the fire station or closing the liquor store, and advised the Commissioners to obtain <br /> 32 public input. ' <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.