My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC PACKET 07242001
StAnthony
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2001
>
CC PACKET 07242001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2015 7:53:05 PM
Creation date
12/30/2015 7:52:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
29
SP Folder Name
CC PACKETS 2001-2004
SP Name
CC PACKET 07242001
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
104
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes <br /> July 17, 2001 <br /> Page 9 <br /> like size and complexity and provide their findings to the Commission. <br /> 2 Comment: All of this will take more time and push out the current schedule. In my opinion a <br /> 3 push out of a few months in schedule would have been significant 10 years ago for this site but <br /> 4 not today. <br /> s Chair Melsha asked Mr. Prosser to elaborate on some of Mr. Nelson's points. <br /> 6 Mr. Prosser stated that the change in the tax structure puts a general education levy back on the <br /> 7 state. He added that, in any case, they need to look at the specific proposal. Mr. Prosser gave <br /> s an example of 300-unit in Richfield that had no effect on the school system. He indicated that <br /> 9 Police services are driven more by retail and corporate. He identified the questions as good <br /> 10 and that they should be noted. Mr. Prosser added that even doing nothing is not a zero-impact <br /> 1 t option. <br /> 12 Jake Kenwalder, who owns a property within the discussed area, came forward to address the <br /> 13 Commission. He stated that notification for the public hearing was not done properly. He <br /> 14 stated his concerns were financial, and that he had received a copy of the tax increment <br /> 15 financing funds that were available. He stated that the numbers he received did not account for <br /> 16 cause and effect of buying businesses and buildings. -He was concerned-about not knowing = <br /> 17 how the cost and cash are going to be established and believed it was reason for not moving <br /> 18 forward. He stated that the actual cost of the property is the problem. He identified the 40% <br /> 19 shortfall and the cost factors involved in this project as the reasons why he does not see it <br /> 20 possible to move forward with the project. He stated he has owned an office in the City of St. <br /> 21 Anthony since 1972. He concluded that, if the 40%can be remedied, he would love to see it <br /> 22 happen, but said he would be happy to see the City wait for a year, or more and let the <br /> 23 financing get straightened out. <br /> 24 Mr. Shardlow stated that the public hearing portion of this is not to be approving anything, but <br /> 25 to recommend moving forward. He stated that they need to see if a real proposal is going to <br /> 26 happen. . <br /> 27 Commissioner Hanson asked if there was a cost associated with the City in order to move <br /> 28 forward. Mr. Shardlow stated that they have essentially completed the work that was in their <br /> 29 contract. <br /> 30 Kenwalder added that he was not the one to call it a public hearing. <br /> 31 Resident Billie Deveaulack asked if the Northwest Quadrant was zoned commercial. Chair <br /> 32 Melsha stated that it was not all zoned commercial. She asked if there was anything to prevent <br /> 33 a property-owner from selling their property. Mr. Prosser stated there was nothing to prevent <br /> 34 a property-owner from selling their property to any developer at this time. He added that the <br /> 35 reality it would be very difficult for a developer to come in at this time and do piecemeal <br /> 36 development. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.