Laserfiche WebLink
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes <br /> June 10, 2003 <br /> Page 5 <br /> 1 Councilmember Thuesen asked how they could really measure the inflow from homes that are <br /> 2 not in compliance. Mr. Hubmer stated that they could review and compare the flow rates, based <br /> 3 on precipitation. He stated that they would be able to see where the flow rates drop for those <br /> 4 who are in compliance. He stated that it is not totally possible to determine how much, in <br /> 5 gallons, might have contributed to the sanitary sewer rates. <br /> 6 <br /> 7 Councilmember Thuesen asked if this issue is 90% of their problem with wastewater inflow. <br /> 8 Mr. Hubmer explained that it would resolve the sewer backup problems and the flow rates into <br /> 9 the Waste Water plant. <br /> 10 <br /> 11 Councilmember Sparks asked how much it would cost to implement a door-to-door campaign. <br /> 12 Mr. Hubmer stated that the costs would depend on how extensively they want to canvas the area. <br /> 13 He stated that it could get very expensive, as they would have hire outside help if they have a 6-8 <br /> 14 month window for compliance. He stated that the biggest issue is time and staffing. <br /> 15 <br /> 16 Councilmember Sparks asked if they have a large number of residents who want to upgrade at <br /> 17 the same time, would the City could get a reduced rate if they were to contract it as a project. <br /> 18 Mr. Hubmer stated that they could probably get a very good rate if they were to combine it as a <br /> 19 project. <br /> 20 <br /> 21 Councilmember Faust suggested an ongoing educational process versus door-to-door canvassing. <br /> 22 He stated that they could educate the public with regards to the timeline for inspections adding <br /> 23 that this could give them a sense of scale that would allow them to move forward with a <br /> 24 contractor. He suggested that Mr. Hubmer put together a plan based on the ideas discussed and <br /> 25 present to Council for consideration. <br /> 26 <br /> 27 Mr. Hubmer stated that he would take the information and formulate it into a plan for <br /> 28 presentation to Council. Mayor Hodson thanked Mr. Hubmer for his time stating that he has <br /> 29 provided the Council with excellent information to consider. <br /> 30 <br /> 31 C. Resolution 03-041, Recommendation for lease option location for the temporal <br /> 32 station. <br /> 33 Fire Chief Hewitt explained that the Council is asked to adopt the draft resolution, which would <br /> 34 provide a new interim location for the fire station until the new fire station has been completed. <br /> 35 He reviewed the process they took to determine an interim location with Council. He stated that <br /> 36 it was important to locate a site that could be fully utilized without additional costs. He stated <br /> 37 that they have to vacate the current building by September 1, 2003 and relocate to a temporary <br /> 38 location where they would reside until the new fire station has been completed. He stated that <br /> 39 they plan to begin construction on May 312004 with a plan to occupy the new site by August 1, <br /> 40 2004. He explained that they have six career people who spend a fair amount of time at the fire <br /> 41 station adding that they want their employees to be fairly comfortable with adequate living space. <br /> 42 He explained that there is also a need for enough space to store their apparatus and they want to <br /> 43 minimize any negative impact to the operations while maintaining quality service and response <br /> 44 time. He reviewed their options with Council stating that they reviewed each location for <br /> 45 ground level access, the cost to bring in a manufactured home for office and living space, utility <br /> 46 costs, and storage. He reviewed the costs for each option stating that they also considered <br /> 47 housing at other fire station locations. He stated that they considered both Columbia Heights and <br />