My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PL PACKET 03171987
StAnthony
>
Parks & Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
1987
>
PL PACKET 03171987
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2015 3:34:04 PM
Creation date
12/30/2015 3:33:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
15
SP Folder Name
PL PACKETS 1987
SP Name
PL PACKET 03171987
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
113
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
-15- <br /> pointed out that there was nothing in the proposed document <br /> - they had been provided that evening which allowed temporary <br /> parking for guests and that no standard had been established <br /> 'for when the Ordinance would be enforced; <br /> -said he would 'have an "ethical' problem with writing another <br /> Ordinance which the City doesn' t -intend to enforce. <br /> In regard to the -stipulation ' that vehicles could only be parked- on paved <br /> surfaces, the Councilmember said . 'there were some homes in St. Anthony, <br /> like his own, which don' t have any asphalt at all, which he assumed would <br /> be in violation of the law immediately upon passage of -the Ordinance. If <br /> the City considered such situations to, be grandfathered. in, the <br /> Councilmember ' said, ' he perceived the Ordinance - would be rendered <br /> ineffective for the problems which the Council hoped to address. <br /> The following responses were made to his statements: <br /> Ranallo -said he would have no problem with allowing "defined gravel <br /> driveways" but wouldn' t want people 'just . throwing sand all <br /> over their backyards for parking. <br /> Soth perceived .the problem with gravel parking areas could be <br /> easily -dealt with in the Ordinance but trying to establish <br /> time restrictions might be tough because specifying hours <br /> vehicles could be parked might create enforcement problems <br /> for the police, who would have to drive around marking cars, <br /> etc. - <br /> Ranallo -reiterated that another problem with the Ordinance as ..it <br /> = was presented -that evening, was that it failed to :provide <br /> restrictions against vehicles being parked in backyards. <br /> Sundland -agreed with the City Attorney that setting time limits- would <br /> be an unwieldly proposition requiring enforcement on an on- <br /> going- basis to keep .it consistent; <br /> -perceived that would require more police manpower than the <br /> City could afford; <br /> wondered- if perhaps the Ordinance might not have to be. . <br /> ' rewritten in .specific: tterms which only addressed the problem <br /> of parking . on -lawns.- <br /> rdinancm , have Makowske' -said she couldnow see -where the.,whole : e - <br /> to be -'reworked�arid..suggested ahe-,:City, might want to restrict <br /> parking to only: paved: -or :graveled: surf aces. without being <br /> specific about the number- of vehicles; <br /> . . concluded the Ordinance--'could always be- made more •.restric- <br /> tive later on- if it didn' t correct the existing problems. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.