Laserfiche WebLink
} <br /> -18- <br /> • <br /> to resident input and hopefully, finally writing .a workable <br /> law which will get to.. the bottom of- the - problems residents <br /> are complaining about. . He said this supported his - <br /> :contention • that the Council does listen to the . residents and <br /> is sincere about getting an enforceable ordinance;. _ ,. ..: , <br /> -cautioned against writing an ordinance -which resulted in <br /> "a parade of people" coming before the Council to get <br /> 'variances . <br /> Ranallo said �he still thought- most people wanted some restriction , <br /> of the number of vehicles and wondered.-if .five might be a <br /> more reasonable number for the vehicles listed . in the Ordi- <br /> nance as long as they. .can -only. be parked on surfaced areas. . <br /> Makowske -said she didn' t think it was the number of vehicles that <br /> bothered most people but rather most of - the residents who <br /> had called her had been more concerned about the appearance <br /> of lawns after cars are parked on them all winter. <br /> Ranallo said one of his callers had complained about a large <br /> sailboat which had been parked on his neighbor 's lawn for <br /> a long time and even hung out over the City' s boulevard. <br /> Marks - reiterated that he still maintained the timing -aspects of <br /> any restrictions had to be addressed. <br /> Soth -said it would be easy to write procedures into -the: Ordinance <br /> but perceived the City would have to be very specific <br /> regarding the number of vehicles which could :be• parked in an <br /> area for a specified time. He suggested the Council might . <br /> even have to address the question of •whether the vehicles <br /> were owned or operated by the homeowners. <br /> In regard to the number of unrelated persons who would be allowed to . live <br /> in a residence, Mr. Lofgren suggested the Council might want to specify. <br /> that "only a - homeowner and three unrelated .. persons could live in a <br /> residence" because he perceived an owner wouldn' t want to ."trash his own <br /> investment. " . -There-.was- general agreement. that -specifying four unrelated <br /> persons in this manner might provide a satisfactory method of preventing <br /> what Councilmember Makowske had been .afraid. of. <br /> Council Action <br /> Motion ',by-:. - Ranallo-, ,seconded by .Makowske to:-.request- the -City Attorney to <br /> rewrite the Ordinance .along. the •lines - of, the•:.ideas:: the Council ,had;..thrown <br /> out that '-evening and to delay -the .f•irst- reading of the Ordinance until - <br /> ztaff. has,: ,figured .:-out a :' way of letting-•::.-.the -residents . ...know . when the <br /> Council-.would: be giving :the- first reading .to- the-'changes. • <br /> = Motion carried unanimously. <br />