Laserfiche WebLink
-12- <br /> challenged Commis ier Werenic,z ' connecting his <br /> 1 "lifestyle" ' with City' s efforts to maintain the • <br /> 2 public safety, we: -e, high standard of living, and <br /> 3 betterment of the munity; and..- <br /> 4 <br /> 5 reiterated his st; ment about nobody being forced to <br /> 6 move next to his _.ge family. <br /> .7 <br /> 8 Jeff Lofgren, 3.109 tinson Boulevard <br /> 9 <br /> 10 -indicated he now ves at theabove address but has <br /> 11 owned three other ,omes in- the Village; <br /> 12 <br /> 13 -opposed the amend !nt which would limit the number of <br /> 14 unrelated• persons --n the same household to . 3 (he pre <br /> 15 ferred 4 ) ; <br /> 16 <br /> 17 -thought.in his ow case, where he is unmarried and <br /> 18 has to make payme zs on an $85 ,000 four bedroom house <br /> 19 he should be allo ed to rent the extra three bedrooms <br /> 20 to make those pay ,ents; <br /> 21 <br /> 22 -thought the whole Ordinance change had come about be- <br /> 23 cause his neighbo:::s had complained to Councilmember <br /> 24 Ranallo about the beer truck he had licensed for <br /> 25 9,000 pounds being: parked in front of- his home and <br />_ 26 also complained about his having a roommate and a • <br /> 27 couple who had just gotten married living with him. <br /> 28 Those neighbors accused him of trying'. to convert his <br /> 29 single family home into a duplex; <br /> 30 <br /> 31 -said the beer tri :�k had been parked at his father ' s <br /> 32 home and at varioi� s -City locations for the past <br /> 33 5 years; <br /> 34 <br /> 35 -insisted the City Manager in April had ' told him the <br /> 36 current Ordinance allows six unrelated persons to <br /> 37 dive in the. same house but rather that he could have <br /> 38 "three unrelated persons besides yourself" , which put <br /> 39 him in compliance at that time; <br /> 40 <br /> 41 agreed with the City' s efforts to remove the <br /> 42 "junkers" from residential area, perceiving that if a <br /> 43 car is a collector ' s item, its owner would never <br /> - . 44. leave it in the backyard; <br /> 45 <br /> 46 -pointed ,out that he had moved the beer truck even <br /> 47 though he didn' t have -to because it was licensed <br /> 48 although there is a person on 33rd and Rankin who <br /> 49 parks semi-trucks in. his backyard; which is certainly <br /> 50 in violation with, the ordinance; <br /> ' 51 <br /> 52: believed he was being harrassed because his neighbor• <br /> 53 had a friend on the -City Council; <br /> 54 <br /> 55 <br />