PL PACKET 03171987 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

-4- 2 Franzese speculated that becau the Penney store had been in. 3 that same location fo such a long time, it probably 4 wouldn'.t. require the same:store: recognition as anew_ 5 business like:-Get It For Less.. 6 7 Wingard -didn' t believe the larger- sign would be out of place 8 on the . east wall but agreed the smaller sign should 9 be removed from the south side. 10 11 .COMMISSION RECOMMENDS SIGNAGE ADDITION 12 • 13. Although-- several of the : Commissioners had indicated. they believed 14 the larger sign might not be too big for the east wall, a smaller 15 sign was recommended in the following: 16 17 Motion by Wagner, seconded by- Har.. ;en to. recommend the. Council, .grant 18 Colite Industries Inc: a variance to the- Sign ordinance which 19 would allow them to mount another Get It For Less sign on the 20 vacant southeast corner of Apacia Plaza Shopping Center. The said 21 sign would be 116 square feet to .hatch the existing sign the store 22 has near its south entrance. .r_ return, the smaller 31. 5 square 23 foot sign on the south side wouL be taken down, leaving Get It For 24 Less with two equal signs, ae on each side of their corner 25 location. 26 27 In recommending .-that the adc tional signage be allowed, thee 28 Planning "Commission finds that: 29 30 *the new sign should not be c= :trimental tc. the public welfare or 31. injurious to' other propert-, in the neighborhood or village 32 since it would be mounted c a, large empty expanse of shopping 33 center wall; 34 35 *a particular hardship to tht: applicant would result if the 36 strict letter of the .regula-ions are adhered to and the impres- 37 sion::is given. that the .store is only operating on•:one .-side of 38 the building, whereas Get It For. Less actually occupies a large 39 portion of, that particular corner of the center;- " 40 n*the conditions upon which this particular variance are based 42 are unique in that the store only has one entrance on that 43 corner even though there is traffic flow on ,both sides; 44 45 *no one spoke against •the..var:iance during the, .Commission hearing 46 and, in fact, there. was 'testimony favoring the, additional sign- 47 age; and _ 48 :.. 49 *the Apache management had assured staff. the. -new signage fit 50 into its signage plans .for the center. 51 . 52 Motion carried unanimously__ 53 54 55