My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PL PACKET 03171987
StAnthony
>
Parks & Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
1987
>
PL PACKET 03171987
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2015 3:34:04 PM
Creation date
12/30/2015 3:33:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
15
SP Folder Name
PL PACKETS 1987
SP Name
PL PACKET 03171987
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
113
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
-11- <br /> - 'added:-:that:: the- City would still be able to-,.,put con- <br /> ditions on such varia.nces. so as to require that all cats <br /> : be. parked on . paved: areas. and. limiting -the .time the <br /> variance:.would be -in force-. <br /> Soth - suggested. the Council might even want to consider grant- <br /> ing conditional use permits. for additional cars which <br /> would--have- to be applied .for. - <br /> Reasoner - suggested the City might even :restrict. the number of <br /> - cars to the number of licensed drivers -in -.a household. <br /> Marks - commented that by making these additions the :Council <br /> might not .be addressing -what he -perceived was. the over- <br /> riding- problem which had prompted the Ordinance changes <br /> . in the first place, the fact that some houses have a <br /> number of unrelated people living in them who have noisy <br /> parties which are police problems; <br /> didn' t think the Ordinance -would solve those problems if <br /> the amendments were modified to allow, people to have <br /> guests parked in their . driveways. for the. same .amount . of <br /> time as most of those parties ,last. <br /> Enrooth - replied that he had never thought the .Ordinance changes. <br /> were intended to solve the problem of noisy parties <br /> because those are enforcement problems- for -the police; <br /> - asked Councilmember ,Marks if he' wanted to restrict <br /> graduation parties . <br /> Ranallo agreed that it. had not been noisy parties which had <br /> caused him to start the discussions - about Ordinance <br /> changes way back in April, but rather, his first con <br /> cern had been the number of businesses operated out of <br /> homes which had. cropped. up in the City lately; <br /> said his second concern was the number of unrelated <br /> people living in some St. Anthony homes, and, ,-finally, <br /> he was concerned about the number of complaints- he <br /> received about the appearance of. lawns once ,cars .parked, <br /> on them all winter long are removed;. <br /> -.-. perceived without the proposed Ordinance changes, the <br /> police are powerless to address the problems; <br /> -- . called for .the. vote on the-.motion he had made. <br /> _. Motion. carried unanimously. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.