My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PL PACKET 03171987
StAnthony
>
Parks & Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
1987
>
PL PACKET 03171987
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2015 3:34:04 PM
Creation date
12/30/2015 3:33:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
15
SP Folder Name
PL PACKETS 1987
SP Name
PL PACKET 03171987
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
113
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
-6- <br /> 1 would be the ' larger. "L" on the' north side, of the <br /> 2 building. . • <br /> 3 <br /> 4-, R-. Nei•l Hamlin,- President of Garment Graphics, : 283.7 <br /> 5 - Anthony Lane•:South, had written a letter to •the City <br /> 6 :supporting the variance -for the ground sign. and urging <br /> - 7 - that Leslie Paper be allowed to keep its existing wall <br /> 8 signage; <br /> 9 <br /> 10 wrote that he felt that signage "is- done in good taste <br /> 11 and does not appear excessive. ." .. <br /> 12 <br /> 13 The hearing was closed at 8 : 10 P.M. for the -following comments from <br /> 14 -Commission members: <br /> 15 :. <br /> 16 Madden -could see no harm in allowing the paper company to <br /> 17 keep. all its wall signage in addition to the ground <br /> 18 sign. <br /> 19 <br /> 20 Hansen -thought only, the large "L" should be kept since the <br /> 21 company' s representatives had indicated the company . <br /> 22 would have no problem with removing its name from the <br /> 23 north wall as long .as' i.t - is reproduced on the ground <br /> 24 sign. <br /> 25 <br /> 26 .Werenicz -agreed. _that only the one wall sign should .be <br /> 27 retained. • <br /> 28 . <br /> 29 Franzese . -also preferred having the "well-designed, attractive, <br /> 30 larger logo" kept on the west side of the building. <br /> 31 <br /> 32 Wagner ' -concurred with that assessment, saying the logo added <br /> 33- to the appearance. of "what is a well maintained <br /> 34 building. " <br /> 35 <br /> 36 Wingard. -was told allowing three signs. for a building might . <br /> 37 set a dangerous precedent; <br /> 38 <br /> 39 -wanted assurance that the wall where the sign is <br /> 40 removed would be patched up. <br /> 41 <br /> 42 COMMISSION .RECOMMENDS .COUNCIL ALLOW REQUESTED SIGNAGE . <br /> 43 <br /> 44 Motion _by Hansen, seconded by Werenicz to recommend the Council <br /> 45- grant .,the necessary.:- variances, :.to the. Sign Ordinance, which Mould <br /> 46 allow Leslie Paper Company to .erect a ground sign :wth 60 square <br /> .47 'feet of sign :surface, where .the OrdinancIe..only allows 36 square <br /> 48 feet, in the '--- location. , they propose , on their. ; property.. . at 2830 <br /> 49 Anthony Lane ., South, as. long as the said .sign -is :installed as the <br /> 50 applicants -have proposed,. of- very - substantial :-construction on a <br /> 51', sodded berm. In addition, the Planning. Commission recommends <br /> 52'' Leslie Paper be`:allowed to retain the :large ."L logo on the west • <br /> 53 <br /> 54 <br /> 55 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.