My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PL PACKET 04211992
StAnthony
>
Parks & Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
1992
>
PL PACKET 04211992
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2015 3:43:30 PM
Creation date
12/30/2015 3:43:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
15
SP Folder Name
PL PACKETS 1992
SP Name
PL PACKET 04211992
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
105
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> 2 FEBRUARY 18 , 1992 <br /> 3 PAGE 9 <br /> 4 <br /> 5 <br /> 6 attempting to tailor the ordinance to accommodate this <br /> 7 business . Urbia responded the intention was to loosen up <br /> 8 the ordinance to accommodate a variety of businesses . <br /> 9 <br /> 10 In his memo, Urbia noted that the general "C" section of - <br /> 11 the zoning ordinance could be amended in a manner that <br /> 12 would conditionally permit certain light industrial uses <br /> 13 in limited areas . A new zoning district could be created <br /> 14 ( "C-1" ) which would permit everything that is currently <br /> 15 permitted in "C" and conditionally permit light <br /> 16 industrial type uses such as silk screen shops , printing <br /> 17 shops , non-retail office, etc . . <br /> 18 <br /> 19 Franzese recalled when this matter was previously <br /> 2.0 discussed there was concern with delivery trucks which <br /> 21 would not fit well with retail businesses . <br /> 22 <br /> 23 Gondorchin still felt CUB would be a traffic generator <br /> 24 and that it would benefit this strip mall . He again <br /> 25 suggested that the "wait and see" posture be taken . <br /> 26 <br /> 27 Chairman Faust noted that Urbia is requesting a consensus <br /> .28 position of the Planning Commission on this matter . He <br /> 29 felt the Commission members are not too excited to do a <br /> 30 new "C-1" district nor any conditional uses . <br /> 31 <br /> 32 Madden felt the Commission was groping not to make a <br /> 33 decision and inquired if this conditional use is <br /> 34 something that can be lived with. <br /> 35 <br /> 36 Chairman Faust felt the people seeking direction deserve <br /> 37 an answer. <br /> 38 <br /> 39 Madden recalled the two deteriorated buildings located at <br /> 40 the St . Anthony Shopping Center which were refurbished <br /> 41 and still did not generate traffic . <br /> 42 <br /> 43 Chairman Faust felt the philosophy of the Planning <br /> 44 Commission had long been not to change the City' s zoning <br /> 45 ordinance. <br /> 46 <br /> 47 Gondorchin felt this was a one time opportunity to help <br /> 48 someone out . <br /> 49 <br /> 50 Murphy referred to the types of uses employed by other <br /> 51 cities cited in Urbia ' s memo . He suggested that the <br /> 52 Planning Commission consider some way to write the zoning <br /> �553 ordinance which would allow for some uses and still <br /> 4 maintain some control . <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.