Laserfiche WebLink
-3- <br /> required to replace the Burger Chef .identification with that of the new <br /> • .franchise which would necessitate removing the chef 's hat in the sign, <br /> thereby shortening the sign by two feet. The Manager said he had <br /> brought the matter to the Commission to see if they concurred that the <br /> change could be interpreted to be only a copy change and would not <br /> require anew variance for that non-conforming sign. <br /> Mr. and Mrs . Johnson were present and had submitted detailed drawings <br /> `J of the word .changes for the sign .which would now be only approximately <br /> four and a .half feet tall, not counting the pole on which it is mounted <br /> on the roof . <br /> Commissioner . Jones indicated he lives close to -the. restaurant and .per- . . <br /> . ceives. the Johnsons have been good neighbors because they have kept <br /> the property and the grounds up so well. . He believed there should be <br /> no variance required because there had been no change in ownership <br /> and the only change in the sign itself had been to make it smaller. <br /> Motion by Commissioner. Jones and seconded by Commissioner Bjorklund <br /> to indicate the Planning Commission -concurs with the City Manager that <br /> the change in signage for the new Hardees restaurant at 4004 Silver <br /> Lake Road- should be interpreted to be no more than a sign copy change <br /> and should not require a new variance to be granted because : <br /> (1) Although it .has a new name , the restaurant would have the same <br /> owner and franchisee. <br /> • (2) -- The business-.would be-.similar.,,to. what it had. been..._._ <br /> (3) The new sign would require less square footage than for which the <br /> original variance was granted. <br /> -(4) The owner and franchisee had no control over the change in signage <br /> since it was required by the new parent company. - <br /> (5) The lighting of the sign would not be intensified and there would <br /> be no "bells or whistles" involved in the change . <br /> Motion carried unanimously. <br /> Mr . Childs then reported another business , Firestone , which is in the <br /> same area had approached him regarding the redesigning of- their existing <br /> signage but had returned to the drawing board when he had told them <br /> they could not increase the square footage without a variance . <br /> When the Chair inquired about the letter of opposition which the Com- <br /> mission .had requested be sent regarding. -the legislation which would <br /> have set requirements for g.ranting .variances and conditional use <br /> permits which would have been difficult to administer, the Manager told <br /> her the- legislation was changed, .making the letter unnecessary.. He also <br /> reported .his secretary has set up. the system of recording all the, <br /> _variances which were -.granted in 1981,�and 1982 as well as all 1983 trans- <br /> • acti:ons,: She. wi-1--1_ tackle .--the . j.ob of .recording all the variances . granted <br /> prior to- 1981 next, which he said,would be very difficult since no <br /> formal system has been followed in the past. <br />