My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC PACKET 08091983
StAnthony
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
1983
>
CC PACKET 08091983
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2015 3:51:46 PM
Creation date
12/30/2015 3:51:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
16
SP Folder Name
CC PACKETS 1981-1984 & 1987
SP Name
CC PACKET 08091983
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
84
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
-3- <br /> lettering which the bank is requesting would add significantly to <br /> either the size or scope of the existing sign and it was his con- <br /> tention that the new message could also be considered a public service . <br /> Mayor: Sundland recalled how hard it had been to get the plans for the <br /> bank approved originally, especially for the sign which was non-con- <br /> forming even at that time, and, based on the information which had <br /> been made available to the Planning Commission, indicated he concurred <br /> with their recommendation for denial . He said he perceives there <br /> should be another means available to the bank to let the public know. <br /> the cash card machines are in the building, without increasing what <br /> is already a non-conforming sign. <br /> Councilman Marks remembered that both the proposed size and height <br /> of the sign had been cut down and the panel which depected an eagle, - <br /> the TCF symbol at that time , had been eliminated in the same sign <br /> area where the additional lettering is now requested. Mr. Shannon <br /> reiterated the same arguments which had been presented when the sign <br /> was first proposed, that the existing sign, in terms of overall size , <br /> is one of the smallest of 57 identifying signs TCF has in the metro- <br /> politan area and that the bank considers it very important to have <br /> uniformity of their sign message. <br /> When asked, Mrs . Makowske indicated she perceives a personal appearance <br /> by the proponents before the Commission might have been helpful and <br /> the Mayor suggested to Mr. Shannon that, if he thought he might have <br /> -additional information which would'"help his' cause, it might' be <br /> beneficial for him to attend the next Commission meeting to see if <br /> he could persuade the Commission members to modify their opposition <br /> somewhat. The Manager confirmed that the Sign Ordinance permits no <br /> monument signs ..in._a commercial area such as the bank' s in St. Anthony, <br /> but the bank is permitted 150 total square footage on the building <br /> itself . <br /> Motion by Councilman Enrooth and seconded by Councilman Marks to table <br /> action on the TCF request for additional signage at 3899 Silver Lake <br /> Road pending the appearance of the sign company representative before <br /> the Planning Commission at their next meeting . <br /> Motion carried unanimously. <br /> Chair Makowske indicated she appreciated the Council ' s concurrence <br /> with Commission recommendations regarding the last .two signs and hoped <br /> they would also find a basis for agreeing with them on the. Elmwood <br /> Lutheran .Church addition request. She read the Commission motion for <br /> denial but indicated she believed the sixth reason for denial , as <br /> stated,. should have been withdrawn because , after the vote was taken, <br /> it 'had- been disclosed that the sketches and plans submitted by the <br /> church trustee July .19th, but which -had not been available for the <br /> August 16th hearing, .should have been adequate for the existing stage <br /> of development.. She indicated she intends to - amend the August 16th <br /> minutes-- to reflect discussion on that point which followed the vote. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.