Laserfiche WebLink
MinnesotH Municipalities <br /> December 27, 1984 <br /> Page 2 of 3 <br /> cS ahli:;hed ci+I le policies, procedures and standards ,vital to the,public interest are carried"out.. <br /> I,y the municipalities thernselves. The state Cable Board' certifies approval_ of local' <br /> franchising actions and acts as a source of problem 'resolution where needed. <br /> Because many of the new federal cable requirements have long been features of Minnesota's <br /> regulations, the effect of-the federal bill's passage into law is minimal on cable systems in this <br /> state. Some illustrations follow: <br /> - CCPA authorizes public, educational and governmental access channels. Minnesota <br /> already has such requirements and may continue them. <br /> CCPA calls for the establishment of "commercial" or leased access channels on cable <br /> systems with certain channel capacities. Minnesota rules already require the <br /> availability of these channels. <br /> - CCPA establishes subscriber privacy protection similar to the privacy protection <br /> already required of Minnesota franchises. They are complementary. <br /> - CCPA provides a Theft of Service section. Minnesota's criminal code statutes have <br /> long contained similar authority for prosecution of individuals unlawfully receiving <br /> cable service. <br /> - CCPA provides for freedom from basic rate regulation after 2 years. Minnesota has <br /> not regulated cable rates at the state level, instead leaving that role to the discretion <br /> of municipalities. The Board's rules have required a provision setting forth the • <br /> procedure for changing rates, and its inclusion in the franchise was made optional in <br /> 1982. <br /> - CCPA establishes a franchise renewal process along with criteria for renewal. The <br /> same general principle is contained in the Minnesota rule requiring negotiations for <br /> renewal to commence at least one year before franchise expiration. The new federal <br /> law requires an earlier commencement of negotiations. <br /> - CCPA calls for an equal opportunity employment requirement for which the FCC will <br /> establish rules. Minnesota's existing rules on this subject should remain in effect until <br /> the FCC's rulemaking is completed. <br /> - CCPA establishes standards for system market value determination. These appear <br /> consistent with Minnesota's rule allowing municipal purchase of a cable system. <br /> - CCPA authorizes municipal ownership as do the Minnesota statutes. <br /> - CCPA contains a section on obscenity which appears congruent with-Minnesota's rule. <br /> - CCPA has a section dealing• with general franchise requirements which is consistent <br /> with Minnesota's established rules. <br /> - CCPA contains a section on easements for cable system construction similar to <br /> Minnesota!§ statutes on the subject adopted in 1983. <br /> The federal intent to preserve existing state cable. regulatory programs also means that • <br /> municipalities in- states such as ours may enjoy the protective framework of franchising <br />