My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC PACKET 03101987
StAnthony
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
1987
>
CC PACKET 03101987
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2015 4:03:29 PM
Creation date
12/30/2015 4:03:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
16
SP Folder Name
CC PACKETS 1981-1984 & 1987
SP Name
CC PACKET 03101987
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
89
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The Ordinance`,Which had.:been written. by the City Attorney had amended the . <br /> definitioh :of "Family" to. allow only three, rather. than six', unrelated <br /> persons.- to, reside in one unit, in accordance with .the . recommendations of. <br /> the Planning Commission after. their January 20th hearing on the proposed <br /> changes. . <br /> Four Councilmembers Favored. Changing Ordinance . Number to Four - One <br /> Preferred Three <br /> The perceptions of the above were as follows: <br /> Sundland -indicated he would have no problem with changing the -number <br /> to four. <br /> Enrooth -said that was the number he had always expected the Ordin- <br /> ance to allow and was the .number he felt''he could -support . <br /> best after the Council' s conversations January 2 7th and <br /> after seeing what the majority of other municipalities <br /> considered reasonable. -. <br /> Marks -said he was sure it had been the Planning Commission who <br /> had reduced the number to three but he would be in :favor of <br /> • increasing it to four. <br /> Ranallo said' he could support four because the City Attorney:-had <br /> interpreted that to mean "four unrelated persons , -whether <br /> or not one was a- homeowner. " <br /> Councilmember Makowske said she -wanted- to stay with three because she was ., <br /> concerned with.' ( 1 ) Minneapolis only allowing three; ( 2 ).., the close <br /> proximity of the U of M to St.. Anthony; and (3 ) the availabi.lity..of <br /> housing in. the. City. <br /> The Mayor told her he recognized. her concerns had originated with what <br /> had happened- in her neighborhood when the homeowner had .moved away and <br /> rented to young persons which had resulted in four people living there <br /> officially but others staying .there unofficially. He said he didn't <br /> think ,-adding another •'person to the Ordinance restriction would guarantee <br /> that wouldn' t happen - again. � Mayor-. Sundland said that situation had <br /> probably been the first one where parking on the lawn : had. become . .a real <br /> problem. <br /> Councilmember Makowske .- persisted -in- -her.-.opinion . that "three would be a . <br /> good workable number. " She-••said ;she.:consider-ed . the Planning Commission <br /> -recommendation to have been- a •good..'-.one - considering:'that most . St. .Anthony <br /> homes•.have- three•: bedrooms <br /> Residents State Their Positions on: the'. Changes <br /> Three residents- were •in -attendance for the, lengthy discussions- which <br /> ensued:- Bernhard Preussner, 3209• Skycrof•t' Drive', indicated he was <br /> r� <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.