My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC PACKET 04281987
StAnthony
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
1987
>
CC PACKET 04281987
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2015 4:05:00 PM
Creation date
12/30/2015 4:04:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
16
SP Folder Name
CC PACKETS 1981-1984 & 1987
SP Name
CC PACKET 04281987
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
93
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
--5- <br /> • -he was also given to understand most commercial -property values had <br /> dropped 17% since the new tax law had passed. <br /> The office condo owner said further: <br /> -his condo is divided into three 360 square foot offices for which <br /> he asks rents of $295 , including utilities; <br /> -he has had a 30% vacancy for the past six months but, even with a <br /> 1000 occupancy, he would be paying 1/3 of this. income in taxes on <br /> the property; <br /> -he considered the rents in the complex to be realistic even though <br /> there is a 40% vacancy; and <br /> he-.perceives it would be necessary for him to go to the bank for <br /> help before he could even sell his property or else continue to lose <br /> money every month. <br /> When he asked the realtors what he could do to solve hi's al lemma, -Mr. <br /> Tromiczak 'said he was told, if he .could get his taxes reduced, the condo <br /> might be , perceived by prospective buyers to be more profitable and its <br /> value might even be raised up to the $75 ,900 he paid for,_ it in the fall <br /> of 1985 . <br /> Assessor's Response <br /> Mr. Holmes indicated it had been he who had set the assessed value on Mr. <br /> Tromiczak' s condo and had explained to him over the phone that: <br /> -all sales which had taken place at the Northgate had been original <br /> developer sales to first owners and each and every one of `them.,had <br /> been in excess of what their 1987 assessed valuations were; <br /> no- secondary sales had occured which could provide a basis fore <br /> reducing those valuations; <br /> -the condos which have been sold had been purchased over the last two <br /> years. There had been gradual price escalations for those properties <br /> during that period and those prices have all been met'. <br /> Mr. Hanscom added that: <br /> residential. and commercial condos started out as very popular pro- <br /> perties to own; <br /> -assessors look at the sales a year prior to the assessments so any <br /> slide in value since January, 1987 , would not be reflected in this <br /> year ' s evaluations ; <br /> -properties that sell in 1987 will be used to determine the 1988 <br /> assessment. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.