My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC PACKET 05101988
StAnthony
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
1988
>
CC PACKET 05101988
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2015 4:29:40 PM
Creation date
12/30/2015 4:29:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
18
SP Folder Name
CC PACKETS 1987-1989
SP Name
CC PACKET 05101988
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
97
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 awarded during the Council' s May 24th meeting following the opening <br /> 2 of the bids in the City Administrative offices on the 19th. <br /> 3 The City Manager said one of the key actions which must precede the <br /> 4 awarding of the bids would be Ramsey County allocating CDBG funds to <br /> 5 help St. Anthony to pay for the filtration system which was scheduled <br /> 6 to be considered at the Ramsey County Board meeting just prior to the <br /> 7 Council meeting the 24th. <br /> 8 Bonding Considered Better Option Than Internal Borrowing for Temporary <br /> 9 Water Filtration System <br /> 10 The copy of the resolution in the agenda packet proposed internal <br /> .11 borrowing of $875 , 000 to cover the costs of a $450 , 000 temporary GAC <br /> 12 system; $194 , 867 the City has already spent on attorneys ' fees , <br /> 13 consultants costs , etc. ; and $200 , 000 to pay costs anticipated to <br /> 14 accrue if the Army doesn' t settle with St. Anthony for a couple of <br /> 15 years . Mr. Childs indicated that, since the resolution had been <br /> 16 inserted in the agenda packet, he had followed Council instructions to <br /> 17 approach the City' s financial consultant, Springsted, Inc. regarding an <br /> 18 alternative method of financing those costs. The consultants had <br /> 19 provided spreadsheets for two different bond issues the Council might <br /> 20 want to use rather than to deplete either the City' s Assessment or <br /> 21 Water Fund. <br /> 22 Mr. Childs detailed for the Council the approximate costs which the <br /> W3 City had incurred to date because of its water contamination problems <br /> 24 for which there had been no reimbursement covered: <br /> 25 *$23 , 000 . 00 the City had to pay for the Roseville water <br /> 26 connection; <br /> 27 *$42 , 500 . 00 in water payments to Roseville; <br /> 28 *$10 , 000 . 00 for extra monthly water testing; <br /> 29 *$12 , 000 . 00 initially paid to three engineering firms for pre- <br /> 30 liminary studies of the problem; <br /> 31 *$40 , 000 . 00 paid to date to Liesch and Associates for expert con- <br /> 32 sulting services related to the City' s lawsuit against the U.S. <br /> 33 Army et al in conjunction with the water contamination problems; <br /> 34 *$53 ,000 . 00 billings to date from Briggs and Morgan law firm who <br /> 35 are representing St. Anthony in that lawsuit. <br /> 36 In addition to other anticipated costs, Mr. Childs reminded the Council <br /> 37 that after 10 years when the EPA no longer pays for maintaining the <br /> 38 system, the City would have to assume about $130 , 000. 00 of those <br /> 39 annual costs forever, or until the contamination ceases. As a <br /> 40 contrast, the City Manager told the Councilmembers he understood New <br /> 41 Brighton had already spent over $800 , 000 in consulting and attorney' s <br /> 42 fees in conjunction with their own water contamination problems. <br /> 43 The financial consultant had provided information on two bonding <br /> 44 options to finance the costs . The first was a GO issue which although <br /> 45 it pushed the City' s first principal payment as far forward as <br /> 15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.