CC PACKET 05101988 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

1 resident and it was his understanding that at the end of five years • 2 the City could start to charge rent for child care leased space at a 3 normal rate. The Councilmember said he perceived the school district 4 would have the right of refusal on additional space but not on a free 5 basis . 6 Sundland agreed with the City Attorney that some reasonable time limits 7 would have to be placed on some of the items like #7 where there might 8 be many reasons in the far future for the City to do something 9 different with this property. As an example, he said "this building 10 won' t stand until the end of time. " 11 Childs said the document was not an offer to sell but rather a list of 12 issues the school district wants resolved, but not necessarily written 13 into the deed. He said it was true that under the proposal, the 14 school district could charge the City for the costs incurred by 15 Community Services concerning staff time for doing non-Community 16 Services ' activities scheduling as long as fees received, if any, for 17 those activities , i .e. , fees charged by the City are turned over to the 18 building owner. 19 Ranallo insisted that the Council had to know exactly what it was going 20 to cost the City in terms of money, parking lot, subsidies , etc . to 21 take over the building. Soth agreed, saying the tax on the deed would be calculated on that *22 23 number. He added that he had earlier prepared a preliminary agreement 24 on the transfer which, though it had changed some , could be used as a 25 model for the final document. 26 when Councilmembers persisted in their concerns about the number of 27 years #3 and #7 would be in force, Mr. Childs indicated it had- been his 28 understanding that groups like the Sports Boosters and the City 29 orchestra, whose programs are scheduled, but not Community Services 30 sponsored, would be able to use the gymnasium and cafeteria when space 31 was available but not. necessarily always free of charge. The decision 32 to make any charges and the amount of such charges would be a Council 33 decision. He said he perceived with #7 , the School Board had just 34 wanted to assure people that they were responding to their concerns , 35 but would not write those concerns into a deed. He speculated the 36 reason the wording about those fees might not have been as clear as it 37 could have been was because the Board' s major concern appeared to be 38 that the City would not be charging fees for day care, Joy of 39 Parenting, or senior activities which are sponsored by the school 40 district through Community Services when they use the guy or 41 cafeteria in years 1 through 5 . He did not perceive there would be any 42 major objection to the City imposing or raising fees for the activities 43 which Community Services does not sponsor. 44 Mr. Childs said he thought that with this document, the Board was only 45 trying to indicate the City had to let the school use their space in • 46 the building in whatever way they wanted in terms of five years for 17