CC PACKET 05101988 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

1 programs, which could mean that the School District would no longer get • 2 the 1 mill tax levy presently received to operate the programs but 3 which would not be transferable to the City. 4 Mr. Childs told Councilmember Ranallo the City would only be 5 responsible for maintaining and cleaning the non-Community service 6 portions of the building under #6 . He said the school only had first 7 right of refusal for additional space within the five year period which 8 means that if the school decided to move a program back into the 9 building within five years, the City could not refuse to let them back 10 into their 15 , 000 square foot space, but only for the first five years. 11 This would require the City to rent any of the School District space 12 which was empty on a month to month basis, he added. 13 Sundland indicated he perceived the school district could eliminate any 14 Community Services programs they wanted within their own 15 , 000 square 15 feet if they needed the space for class rooms in those 5 years. 16 Makowske suggested that for clarification, wherever the document 17 referred to "Community Services" , the correct wording should be 18 "Community Services/School District #282" as the School Board had 19 specified in item #3 . 20 Marks disagreed with the assumption that the City would be subsidizing 21 the child care program for five years , saying it didn' t make any 22 difference how the School District used the space since the agreement 024 3 only said 15 , 000 square feet had to be available to them for five years at no charge. He said that it was the school' s decision to whom and 25 how an actual subsidy was made. However, he agreed that the figures 26 Councilmember Enrooth had offered should be specified when estimating 27 what the City would be paying for the building. 28 29 Manager Perceives. Agreement Possible 30 The Manager indicated that based on the fact that the City had already 31 decided not to move the fire station up to Parkview, he now felt staff 32 would be able to put a contract together which met the concerns of both 33 the City and School District #282 and would start the transfer process. 34 He also agreed to prepare a pro forma document indicating just how the 35 transfer would benefit the City. 36 Council Action 37 Motion by Marks, seconded by Sundland to adopt Resolution 88-017 and to 38 request the City Attorney and Manager to prepare the documentation 39 necessary to start the Parkview transfer- process. 40 RESOLUTION 88-017 41 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL REGARDING 42 THE TRANSFER OF OWNERSHIP OF THE PARKVIEW •43 COMMUNITY CENTER PROPERTY 19