Laserfiche WebLink
Planning Commission Meeting <br /> April 17, 1990 <br /> Page 9 <br /> 1 The notification requirements for public hearings were explored with <br /> 2 the City Manager advising that if there was any question at all -whether <br /> 3 that requirement had been met for this hearing, action should be tabled <br /> 4 <br /> 5 Commission Recommendation <br /> 6 <br /> 7 Motion by Werenicz , seconded by Wagner to table action on the Weiss <br /> 8 request until the third Tuesday in May, 1990. <br /> 9 <br /> 10 Motion carried unanimously. <br /> 11 <br /> 12 The meeting was recessed from 8 : 58 P.M. to 9 : 05 P.M. when Chairperson <br /> 13 Madden read aloud the Notice of Hearing to consider the request from <br /> 14 James and Harriet Pirino to allow a 33 foot front yard setback from <br /> 15 the average front yard of the two adjacent lots of 53 feet required by <br /> 16 Ordinance. Approval of the petition for the 20 foot variance would <br /> 17 allow the applicants to locate the home they had moved into St . Anthony <br /> 18 facing east on their property at 2917 33rd Avenue -N. E. with a garage <br /> 19 proposed in the front of the house leaving a front yard setback of only <br /> 20 33 feet . <br /> 21 <br /> 22 The notice had been published in the April 4th Bulletin and sent to all <br /> 23 property owners of record within 300 eet of the subject property . No <br /> 24 one present reported failure to receive the notice or objected to its <br /> 25 content. <br /> 26 <br /> 27 Staff Report <br /> 28 <br /> 29 City Manager Burt reiterated much of the information in his April 10th <br /> 30 1990 memorandum and gave the timetable of events which had prompted <br /> 31 Public Works Director Hamer to issue a stop work order on the construction <br /> 32 of the garage early in March. As noted in his memorandum , Mr. Burt <br /> 33 indicated the project was allowed to proceed with the understanding <br /> 34 on the part of the applicants that finishing the block work on the garage <br /> 35 would be at their own risk and. could be ordered out, pending the outcome <br /> 36 of the variance request. <br /> 37 <br /> 38 The City Manager reported he had consulted City Attorney Soth regarding <br /> 39 the lanquage in the City Ordinance regarding front yard setback require- <br /> 40 ments . Mr. Soth agreed that the 1973 Ordinance ml gbt be open to intre- <br /> 41 pretation which he perceived could be made by the Planning Commission <br /> 4.2 and Council. A copy of the pertinent section of the ordinance had <br /> 43 been provided in the agenda packet. <br /> 44 r <br /> 45 The City Manager also indicated he had driven around the City and re- <br /> 46 searched the files regarding any non conforming front yard setbacks. <br /> 47 This had led him to conclude that except for the homes which were destroy- <br /> 48 ed by the 1984 tornado and were allowed to be reconstructed on their <br /> 49 original foundations as well as those which had been grandfathered in <br /> 50 with the adoption of the 1973 Ordinance, there was only one home where <br />