Laserfiche WebLink
SEP. -21' 00 (THU) 16: 17 TEL:612 421 9511 <br /> 21 <br /> Planning Commission Meeting Minutes <br /> September 19, 2000 <br /> • Page 2 <br /> 1 Assistant City Manager Spencer Isom reported that the owner of Apache Animal Clinic has ap- <br /> 2 plied to replat the properties into three lots in order to expand the size-of the Iot on which the <br /> 3 animal clinic is located, decrease the size of the lot on which the Industrial Custom Products. <br /> 4 building is located, and create a new lot to the east of the industrial building. The property <br /> 5 would be replatted as Lots 1,2 and 3,Block 1,Apache Terrace,2nd Addition, Ramsey County, <br /> 6 Minnesota. <br /> 7 Isom directed the Commission's attention to a letter dated September 19, 2000 from City Attor- <br /> e ney Soth. Isom noted that the Commission can consider this application as long as it is in <br /> 9 compliance with the nine items noted in City Attorney Sothis letter of September 19, 2000. <br /> 10 Isom noted that the Staff and City Attorney had noted that they could proceed with the prelimi- <br /> 11 nary plat, as long as the properties in question were completed. However,the Planning Commis- <br /> 12 sion can approval the final plat with the understanding that the conditions would be met. The <br /> 13 City Council would hear this issue after the nine conditions have been met. <br /> 14 After calling for public input regarding this matter and hearing none, Vice Chair Melsha closed <br /> 15 the public hearing at 7:16 p.m, <br /> 0 6 Motion by Stille, second by Tillmann,to approve the Apache Terrace 2nd addition application . <br /> 7 subject to the nine items that are outlined in City Attorney Soth's letter of September 19, 2000 to <br /> 18 Ken Solie and Raymond Ogren from Dorsey & Whitney . <br /> 19 Isom noted that this issue would be tentatively set for the September 26, 2000 City Council <br /> 20 meeting, as long as the conditions are met as noted above and the City Attorney is satisfied. <br /> 21 Furthermore, Isom noted that all items regarding the application should be sent to the City Attor- <br /> 22 ney, with a copy to the City Staff. <br /> 23 VI. POSTPONED APPLICATIONS. <br /> 24 None. <br /> 25 VII. REPORTS, PRESENTATIONS,AND/OR CONCEPT REVIEWS. <br /> 26 None. <br /> 27 VIII. CONTINUED BUSINESS. <br /> 28 1. F.stabli h Subcommittee To Finalize the Draft Antennae Ordinance In R=aration for_Eu- <br /> 29 tare Commission and Council Consideration. <br /> 30 Assistant City Attorney Isom noted that to draft and incorporate a change into the City Code can <br /> 31 be a complicated process. It is therefore his hope and anticipation that the Planning Commission <br /> 32 would proceed through the necessary research via a subcommittee, and then follow through with <br /> 03 a draft proposal to present to the members of the Planning Commission, A subcommittee could <br /> 4 facilitate the process. <br />