My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC PACKET 02112003
StAnthony
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2003
>
CC PACKET 02112003
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2015 8:00:21 PM
Creation date
12/30/2015 8:00:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
29
SP Folder Name
CC PACKETS 2001-2004
SP Name
CC PACKET 02112003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
88
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
` City Council Regular Meeting Minutes 4 <br /> January 28, 2003 <br /> Page 4 <br /> Motion carried unanimously. <br /> Mr. Prosser reviewed the activities which will be required to complete the redevelopment for the <br /> Northwest Quadrant Revitalization Project. <br /> Mr. Prosser stated the City will need to create a Redevelopment Tax Increment Financing <br /> District in order to assist in paying for the public costs associated with the redevelopment. He <br /> stated Ehlers &Associates is in the beginning stages of providing information so the City may <br /> establish a Tax Increment District. He said a public hearing will be required as a part of this <br /> process. <br /> Mr. Momson stated proposals are currently being requested for firms to do the inspection. He <br /> said this will also be reimbursed by the Developer. <br /> Councilmember Horst asked if work has already been done on the previous development efforts. <br /> City Attorney Gilligan stated those determinations were done at least three years ago,but new <br /> inspections need to be done in order to update the reports. <br /> Mr. Prosser stated they are in a position to expedite the approval process. He said Ehlers & <br /> Associates, Mr. Gilligan's firm and the City stay in touch with the legislative issues. He stated <br /> the reason inspections need to be done is because property is being added, the rules have <br /> changed, and the inspections are dated. <br /> Mr. Prosser stated the Development Concept Review is where the Developer prepares a concept <br /> that responds to the City's needs and is market and financially feasible. He noted that one of the <br /> issues identified by the community is affordable housing. He said this will be addressed as they <br /> proceed to the Development Concept Review. He said the primary focus is to make sure the City <br /> remains viable. He noted that this step will be closed when the Developer brings back the final <br /> development framework and it's'accepted. He said the formal planning review process begins <br /> after this. <br /> Mr. Prosser said the Land Use Approvals is an activity which identifies and reviews all land use <br /> and other regulatory approvals required for development. These Land Use Approvals are <br /> separate and independent from the Development Concept Review and the Developer Assistance <br /> Agreement. <br /> Mr. Prosser stated the Development Agreement is the next step which outlines the level and form <br /> of assistance to be provided to the Developer. He said this includes both financial assistance and <br /> land assembly. It also specifies Developer performance for type and timing of development. He <br /> said the final development concept is part of the final Development Agreement (subject to land <br /> use approval). He said an outline of the Development Agreement will be submitted in the next <br /> few months. <br /> Mr. Morrison asked if the Development Agreement and the PUD (Planning Unit Development) <br /> could be done simultaneously. City Attorney Gilligan responded that was the hope. He said it <br /> makes sense to put them together within the same time frame, if possible. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.