My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC PACKET 07222003
StAnthony
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2003
>
CC PACKET 07222003
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2015 8:02:13 PM
Creation date
12/30/2015 8:02:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
29
SP Folder Name
CC PACKETS 2001-2004
SP Name
CC PACKET 07222003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
80
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
46 <br /> Page 2 — Northgate Office Park Sign Variances <br /> square feet and the petitioners propose a 96 square-foot sign, which is 16 square feet <br /> over the city maximum. . <br /> The other item that is not in compliance with the sign ordinance is the fact that the <br /> petitioners propose a pylon sign. A pylon sign is not allowed in the City with the <br /> exception of in a commercial zoning district at gas stations. <br /> There are other items, which should be noted. The landscaping proposed for the sign is <br /> not adequate. The petitioners propose minimal landscaping which is not aesthetically <br /> pleasing. Ground signs must be landscaped. Landscaping may consist of shrubs, <br /> plants, rocks, or other decorative material located around the pedestal. The petitioners' <br /> show the proposed sign with a shrub, evergreen tree, and decorative rock distanced a <br /> part from the sign. <br /> Another ground sign code requirement is the pedestal width of a ground sign must be <br /> least equal to the sign width. Although that is the case on the proposed sign, it looks out <br /> of balance with the proposed height. <br /> Staff Recommendation: <br /> Although the petitioners at Northgate Office Park are in need of a sign, the City must <br /> adhere to its own standards. The proposed sign is too far out of line from the City's sign <br /> ordinance. It misses the mark on almost every city code criterion for a ground sign. A <br /> pylon sign is not allowed by the sign ordinance and that is for a reason; it is not <br /> acceptable by city standards. City staff recommends denial of the proposed sign <br /> application. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.