Laserfiche WebLink
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes 07 <br /> June 8,2004 <br /> Page 7 <br /> 1 licensed organization's fiscal year, each organization must file with the City a report prepared by ;a <br /> 2 an independent certified public accountant documenting compliance with the requirements of <br /> 3 this section." <br /> 4 <br /> 5 Councilmember Faust stated this at one time was going to be limited to St. Anthony Market and <br /> 6 now it appeared that was not the case. Mr. Gilligan replied they could not designate the <br /> 7 charitable organization for charitable gambling, nor the location,but they could limit the number <br /> 8 of organizations. <br /> 9 <br /> 10 City Manager Mornson recommended that the Council approve Ordinance 04-002 relating to <br /> 11 lawful gambling; amending section 500 of the St. Anthony City Code. <br /> 12 <br /> 13 Motion by Councilmember Faust, seconded by Councilmember Stille, to adopt Ordinance 04- <br /> 14 002 Relating to Lawful Gambling;Amending Section 500 of the St. Anthony City Code. (3rd <br /> 15 Reading). <br /> 16 <br /> 17 Motion carried unanimously. <br /> 18 <br /> 19 D. Consider Ordinance 2004-003: re: Peddlers Solicitors and Transient Merchants (2"a <br /> 20 Reading). <br /> 21 City Manager Mornson indicated to the Council that it was brought to his attention that the City <br /> 22 was completing computerized criminal background checks on Peddlers, Solicitors and Transient <br /> 23 Merchants without the proper language in the City ordinance. <br /> 24 <br /> 25 He stated that the changes that are highlighted were reviewed by the Police Department and were <br /> 26 recommended for amendment,which then gives the City the authority to conduct criminal <br /> 27 checks on Peddlers and Solicitors. <br /> 28 <br /> 29 He referred to Captain Ohl's memorandum dated May 6, 2004 reading: <br /> 30 <br /> 31 It has come to my attention that we are completing BCA Computerized Criminal Checks on <br /> 32 peddlers, solicitors, and transient merchants without the proper language in our Ordinance <br /> 33 number 1130. <br /> 34 <br /> 35 The Bureau of Criminal Apprehension specifically states that: <br /> 36 <br /> 37 • We must have an ordinance that expressly, or by implication, authorizes the use of CCH <br /> 38 records for the screening of an applicant, <br /> 39 • The ordinance must require the signed consent of the applicant, <br /> 40 • The ordinance must include the grounds and reasons in determining denial; <br /> 41 e The ordinance must require notification to the applicant for the reason for the denial. <br /> 42 <br /> 43 I would suggest the following language be added to Section 1130 of our City Ordinance: <br /> 44 <br /> 45 Investigation and issuance <br /> 46 <br />