Laserfiche WebLink
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes 05 <br /> June 8, 2004 <br /> Page 5 <br /> 1 8. Prepayment can occur at any time without penalty <br /> 2 9. Full repayment is expected in spring of 2007 when development is finalized. <br /> 3 However, the City/HRA can repay at anytime <br /> 4 10. Debt is General Obligation to the City <br /> 5 11. The City/HRA can not utilize any other Fannie Mae funds to repay the loan <br /> 6 12. All legal fees of Fannie Mae to be paid by the City/HRA at closing(whether the <br /> 7 loan closes or not). Legal fees generally are between$2,500 and $5,000 <br /> 8 13. City/HRA has to pay origination fee of 100 basis points at closing($33,500) <br /> 9 14.. City/HRA is required to submit financial statements annually for Fannie Mae <br /> 10 review until the loan is repaid and submit the annual TIF reports required by the <br /> 11 State of Minnesota. <br /> 12 <br /> 13 Ms. Kvilvang stated it should be noted that all out of pocket expenses incurred by the City/IRA <br /> 14 will be reimbursed by the Developer and/or through Tax Increment (TIF). <br /> 15 <br /> 16 Councilmember Stille asked if this had become a commonplace program. Ms. Kvilvang replied <br /> 17 this was a commonplace program that Fannie Mae had started to aid developers. <br /> 18 <br /> 19 Motion by Councilmember Thuesen, seconded by Councilmember Horst, to adopt Resolution <br /> 20 04-047—Authorizing Execution of Loan Documents with Fannie Mae for$3,350,000 Loan. <br /> 21 <br /> 22 Motion carried unanimously. <br /> 23 <br /> 24 C. Consider Ordinance 2004-002; re Charitable Gambling. Ord Reading) <br /> 25 City Attorney Gilligan reviewed with the Council an amendment to the charitable gambling <br /> 26 ordinance based on the fact that the current ordinance allows charitable gambling to on-sale <br /> 27 municipals only. He indicated that with the closing of the Stonehouse, the City no longer owned <br /> 28 an on-sale municipal. With Spectators located where the Stonehouse sued to be,he felt it was <br /> 29 important to get the ordinance changed prior to the opening of the restaurant. <br /> 30 <br /> 31 City Attorney Gilligan indicated that this was the 3rd reading with the 1St and 2nd readings taking <br /> 32 place on May 11 and 25, 2004. He added that he also passed the ordinance onto some of the <br /> 33 Sports Boosters that he has been working with on the charitable gambling license for Spectators. <br /> 34 He stated that this is the final reading of this ordinance and that all of the suggestion and <br /> 35 concerns from previous meeting have been incorporated into this final ordinance. <br /> 36 <br /> 37 City Attorney Gilligan reviewed his May 19, 2004 memorandum reading: <br /> 38 <br /> 39 At its meeting on May 11th the City Council gave first recording to an ordinance amending <br /> 40 Section 535.02 to permit charitable gambling to be conducted in restaurants in the City holding <br /> 41 an on-sale liquor license. At that meeting the City had various questions concerning the City's <br /> 42 authority to regulate this activity. <br /> 43 <br /> 44 Under Minnesota Statutes, Section 349.213, the City has the authority to adopt more stringent <br /> 45 regulation of lawful gambling than provided by Minnesota law, including the prohibition of <br /> 46 lawful gambling. The City may not require that an organization licensed by the Minnesota <br /> 47 Gambling Control Board obtain a license or permit from the City as a condition for it to conduct <br />