My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PL PACKET 08181987
StAnthony
>
Parks & Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
1987
>
PL PACKET 08181987
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2015 3:35:36 PM
Creation date
12/30/2015 3:35:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
15
SP Folder Name
PL PACKETS 1987
SP Name
PL PACKET 08181987
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
83
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
�l -9- <br /> 2 A sketch of the -elevations of the new store which, it was agreed, had <br /> 3 not been presented at either the Commission hearing or .Council <br /> 4 consideration October 28th, was also included. <br /> 5 The informal discussion which followed brought out the following <br /> 6 comments: <br /> 7 Madden -said he had been very surprised when what he thought was a <br /> 8 "remodeling project" turned out to be a complete removal of <br /> 9 all but the foundation and floors of the existing store. <br /> 10 Childs -gave the Chair Pro Tem the signage which the store would be <br /> 11 allowed under the Ordinance and added the instances where. the <br /> 12 City has allowed a second sign when a store fronts on two <br /> 13 streets. Mr. Childs later confirmed that the store is be- <br /> 14 tween platted streets, a service road Sunset and Highway 88 ; <br /> 15 -also confirmed that the store size had gone from 693 square <br /> 16 feet to 1,100 square feet with the new addition; <br /> 17 -estimated the total current signage to be about 150+ square <br /> 18 feet which is not much above what would be allowed by vari- <br /> 19 ance for two signs. <br /> *0 Plaisted -said the sign on top of the building is .6, X 8 . The sign on <br /> 21 the back of the building before the remodeling was 8 X 10 and <br /> 22 the signage on front was a "Blizzard" sign which was up .for <br /> 23 many years; <br /> 24 <br /> 25 -agreed. the plans which had been given the Commission at the <br /> 26 October 21st meeting were a sketch of the remodeling plans <br /> 27 and not the sketch in the agenda packet that night; <br /> 28 -insisted the Commission had been shown pictures of another <br /> 29 Dairy Queen store showing both sides of the proposed build- <br /> 30 ing, including two signs in the mansard roof, during the <br /> 31 hearing; <br /> 32 -insisted pictures had never been returned to him. <br /> 33 werenicz -said his recollection of the October 21st meeting was that <br /> 34 the big issue had been whether the rotating sign would <br /> 35 remain; <br /> 36 said he certainly hadn' t envisioned the extent of the "remo- <br /> 37 . -deling" which had followed and had come away from the meeting <br /> 38 thinking only the rotating sign and one other wall sign had <br /> 39 been agreed: to; <br /> 00 said -he was certain "no one in the Commission had envisioned <br /> 41 the building coming down. " <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.