Laserfiche WebLink
2 -courts from the common area in :Outlot A to Outlot <br /> 3 B, which is, the property owner-' s. own -back yard. <br /> 4 Staff report :. Childs reiterated July 24th memorandum advice that <br /> 5 the request represented a simple lot split for which <br /> 6 every thing appeared to be in order;' and <br /> 7 had included in the agenda packet the survey which he <br /> 8 . - had also provided the Planning Commission. <br /> 9 Hamer indicated the Public Works Department had the <br /> 10 problem with erosion around the sewer line west .of <br /> 11 Mr. Churilla' s home at 2608-34th Avenue N.E. , on its <br /> 12 project schedule, which had lengthened considerably <br /> 13 with the heavy rainfall the previous Thursday night. <br /> 14 Commission <br /> 15 recommendation: Council approval. <br /> 16 Council Action <br /> 17 Motion by Makowske, seconded by Marks to approve the request from Rick <br /> 18 Johnson, 3306 Belden Drive, for subdivision without platting to allow <br /> 4 the transfer of a parcel of land approximately 22 feet X 72 feet in size . <br /> from. Outlot A to Outlot B of Johnson Manor Subdivision as indicated in <br /> 21 the survey in the Council' s .July 28 , 1987 agenda packet. The purpose of <br /> 22 the transfer is to transfer unused land from the parcel the owner had <br /> 23 dedicated for a tennis court common area to his own back yard. <br /> 24 In granting approval, the Council finds, as did the Planning Commission, <br /> 25 that: <br /> 26 *Mr. Johnson initially owned all the property in this subdivision and <br /> 27 this transfer would only allow him to take back a piece of land not <br /> 28• needed for the tennis courts constructed in the common area he had <br /> 29 dedicated for that purpose; <br /> 30 *Staff reported receiving no letters or calls objecting to the transfer <br /> 31 either before or after the July 14th hearing or the July 28th Council <br /> 32 consideration and no one appeared at either meeting to voice an objec- <br /> 33 tion to the proposal. <br /> 34 Motion carried unanimously. <br /> 35.: Council Perceives Supreme Court Rulings Preclude Denial of variances to <br /> 36 Develop Substandard Lot on Corner of 37th Avenue and Roosevelt N.E. <br /> 37 Application for variances for: <br /> -lot size of 5 ,648 square feet where 11 ,000 square <br /> 9 feet are required by Ordinance for a : single family <br /> 40 home and 14 ,000- square- feet for -a -duplex; <br />