PL PACKET 08181987 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

-3- 2 feet X 72 feet in size from Outlot A to Outlot B of Johnson Manor Subdivision as indicated on the sketch -in the Commissioners July 21, 4 1987' agenda packet. The purpose of the transfer is to transfer unused 5 land from the parcel the owner had dedicated for a tennis court common 6 area to his own back yard. 7 In recommending approval, the Planning Commission finds: 8 *Mr. Johnson initially owned all this property and this transfer 9 would only be allowing him to take back a piece of land not needed 10 for the tennis courts constructed on the common area he had 11 dedicated for that purpose; 1.2 *staff reported receiving no letter or calls objecting to the 13 transfer and no one appeared at the Planning Commission hearing 14 to voice an objection to the proposal. 15 Motion carried unanimously. 16 UNFINISHED BUSINESS 17 Commission Recommends Council Grant Two Variances for Undeveloped Lot On 18 Southeast Corner of 37th Avenue N.E. and Roosevelt Street N.E. 19 Action had been tabled June 16th on the petition from William Campbell 20 of Campbell Construction Incorporated, 12409 Drake Street N.W. , Coon * Rapids, to construct a home on the above property which would require 2 . variances for a substandard lot and house size as well as a 14 foot 23 setback from 37th Avenue N.E. , where 30 feet are required by Ordinance. 24 The Commission. direction, in their motion to table, had been that legal 25 ownership of the property be established before the matter was returned 26 for Commission consideration. 27 A copy of the June 22nd letter from the Randall, Dehn & Goodrich law 28 firm to Mr. Childs had been included in the agenda packet, which 29 addressed this issue by stating that "as Special Administrator ' to be ' , 30 Don Flynn, the law firm' s deceased client' s brother, had concurred with 31 Mr. Campbell ' s variance application to build a 26 foot X 38 foot house 32 on the said lot. 33 The Chair Pro Tem read aloud the notice of the June 16th hearing which 34 had gone out to all the property owners within 3200 feet of the subject 35 property and stated, that, as had been promised at the conclusion of 36 that hearing, those same neighbors had been notified that the request 37 would be reconsidered at the July 21st Commission meeting. This notice 38 advised the neighbors that, although the legally required public hearing 39 on the matter had been closed, any of them who cared- to do. so would be 40 permitted � to provide further input to the issue at this meeting. •