Laserfiche WebLink
1 Councilmembers Marks and Ranallo moved . that the Commission <br /> • recommendation be accepted. <br /> 3 Councilmember Makowske indicated she would rather see the specific <br /> 4 number of licenses dropped and Mr. Bonaventura's Conditional Use Permit <br /> 5 amended to delete any reference to number of licenses allowed this <br /> 6 location because: <br /> 7 *the fact that only a total of 106 such licenses are allowed in the <br /> 8 . City by Ordinance would in itself place a certain limitation on the <br /> 9 number of licenses which would be available to Mr. Bonaventura; <br /> 10 *the Council would avoid specifying that almost half of the licenses <br /> 11 which can be issued would go to one business. <br /> 12 Mayor Sundland agreed that no top number should be imposed on this <br /> 13 permit, perceiving that the applicant had testified that 45 was the <br /> 14 optimum number of devices his operation could use anyway. <br /> 15 Mr. Childs told Councilmember Ranallo the Ordinance restricting the <br /> 16 number of licenses in the City had been adopted after the Fun Center had <br /> 17 opened and the licenses that establishment held were not limited by a <br /> 18 Conditional Use Permit. <br /> 19 Councilmember Marks indicated he would be willing to amend his motion <br /> 20 in accordance with Councilmember Makowske's recommendation, perceiving <br /> 46 there had been no such restrictions placed on any other business with <br /> amusement devices up to now. <br /> 23 None of the residents who were present for the meeting indicated an <br /> 24 interest in the issue or objected to the deletion. <br /> 25 Council Action <br /> 26 Motion by Marks, seconded by Ranallo to delete all references to the <br /> 27 number of licenses for amusement devices contained in Conditional Use <br /> 28 Permit #88-08 which had been issued to Michael Bonaventura for the malt <br /> 29 shop at 3800 Silver Lake Road, finding that: <br /> 30 1. The deletion meets all three conditions which are required to be <br /> 31 satisfied before a Conditional Use Permit may be authorized. <br /> 32 2. There was no, opposition demonstrated to increasing the number of <br /> 33 licenses allowed this establishment during the Planning Commission <br /> 34 hearing September 20th and no opposition to the deletion of license <br /> 35 limitations was expressed during the Council consideration. <br /> 36 3 . The Council concurs with the Planning Commission perception that the <br /> 37 malt shop is an asset to the community. <br /> 38 Motion carried unanimously. <br /> • 3 <br />