PL PACKET 06161989 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

t I i 1 Ms. VanderHeyden reiterated that the new canopy sign across the front 2 of the building was the one sign allowed for the business, but the half 3 barrel canopy sign which is proposed be to relocated over the west 4 entrance was one on which the Council was seeking Planning Commission 5 recommendation, taking into consideration only the two sides which would 6 show from the street and the fact that the Stonehouse is located on a 7 corner and can be seen from a number of streets. The Acting City 8 Manager also drew to the Commission's attention the fact that the total 9 sign surface (144 square feet) was under the 150 square feet allowed per 10 business. 11 Ray Nelson, the Liquor Operations Manager, indicated the BAR and GRILL 12 lettering would be painted over on the southern exposure which can't be 13 seen from the street anyway. He also explained to the Chair that the 14 Speakeasy Bar was not being used by the City except for rental purposes 15 at this time and he perceived the sign at that entrance could be 16 considered a type of directional sign which is usually allowed any 17 business. The BAR and LOUNGE lettering on the wall nearest the former 18 bottle sop could also be removed, although there would be nothing to 19 indicate that entrance if that was done. 20 Ms. VanderHeyden told Chair Madden the City's policy regarding the type 21 . of hand lettered signs which announce special events, etc. was that 22 businesses are all allowed to put up such temporary signs for two weeks 23 after notifying the City. The Chair commented that regardless of the 24 City's policy, he thought such signage looked very "tacky" . Mr. Nelson 25 responded that he supposed they could use electronic ticker tape type 26 billboards like the neighboring Main Event and Brandywine, but they 27 would cost a lot of money and would be considered additional signage. 28 As a justification for the additional signage on the west side of the 29 building, Mr. Nelson pointed out that without that signage there was 30 nothing on that side to let drivers on Kenzie Terrace, St. Anthony 31 Boulevard or Silver Lake Road know what was inside the building. 32 When Commissioner Hansen commented that from reading the Council minutes 33 he had concluded the Council had already approved all -the signage, Ms. 34 VanderHeyden said what they had approved had been the signage for the 35 front of the building but had indicated they would like the Planning 36 Commission's reaction to the additional signage on the west side which 37 would be the relocated half barrel canopy sign with lettering for the 38 STONEHOUSE and DINING and DANCING on the front and north side. The 39 Chair commented that the proposal was actually for two signs on that 40 side which, of course, was the same as had been allowed the Salvation 41 Army Thrift Store at Apache. 42 Commissioner Hansen said he didn't think the Commission should only be 43 consulted regarding the signage on the west side, perceiving their 44 consideration should be given instead to the whole signage package. 45 Commissioner Franzese told him she guessed that hadn't been done because 46 this was for a City-owned business which used its revenues to offset the 47 residents taxes. His response was that he was also concerned about 2