Laserfiche WebLink
[ RECEIVED 87/25 12:54 1995 AT GIZ5959521 PAGE 5 (PRINTED PAGE 5) 1 <br /> JLL-25-1995 1209 AMSD 666 8462 P.05 <br /> House Research Departrnent September 1994 <br /> Minnesota School Futancc Page 10 <br /> eonoeatrarion principle has stayed the same over time, the actual calculation of AFDC <br /> pupil units has changed several tittles in recent years. <br /> For the 1992-93 school year and later, AFDC pupil units are computed by multiplying the <br /> number of pupils in the district from AFDC families times the district's AFDC weighting <br /> factor times .65. A district's AFDC weighting factor is equal to the lesser of 1 or the <br /> quotient obtained by dividing the district's AFDC count (expressed as a percentage of total <br /> average daily membership) by 115%. <br /> In other words, in a district where more than 115% of the pupils are from AFDC families, <br /> each AFDC pupil carries a pupil unit weight of.65. For districts with less than 11.5% <br /> concentration, the AFDC pupil weight increases from 0 to .65 per AFDC pupil as the <br /> percentage of AFDC pupils increases. <br /> The number of pupils from families receiving AFDC-is counted in October of each year <br /> by county human services workers. The county employees report the carat to the <br /> Irmnesota departmem of Human Services who report district totals to the state department <br /> of education. The formula uses the average of the previous two October's counts, unless <br /> the district's count has increased for three consecutive years in which case the count is <br /> equal to the previous year's count. <br /> For the period of time from the 1988-89 school year to the 1991-92 school year, AFDC <br /> pupil units were counted as zero for districts with less than 6% of their pupils from AFDC <br /> families and for districts with more than 6% of their pupils from AFDC families, an <br /> additional .1 pupil unit was generated for each percentage point that the district's AFDC <br /> count exceeded 5%, except that in no case could the additional AFDC pupil weighting <br /> exceed .6. <br /> Sales Ratio: A sales ratio is a statistical measure prepared by the Department of Revenue that <br /> measures the difference between the actual sales prices of property and the assessors nwket <br /> values on those properties. 'Ile purpose of the sales ratio is to neutralize the effect of different <br /> assessment practices among the taxing jurisdictions of the state. This is a critical component <br /> of an equalized system of school financing. The sales ratio is divided into the taxable .,alue to <br /> obtain the adjusted tax capacity of a school district. <br /> Seco>adary Sparsity Revenue: Revenue paid to small. sparsely populated school distri:.ts. <br /> The secondary sparsity revenue formula takes into account the secondary enrollment, tr <br /> distance between high schools,and the surface area of the district. Secondary sparsity -evenue <br /> is a component of the general education revenue program. <br /> Tart Capacity percentages: Statutory classification percentages that are applied to ma Ket <br /> values. Tax Capacity Pere stages replace classification ratios. <br /> Tax Capacity Rate: no rate arrived at by dividing each districes tax levy amount by the <br /> district's total tax capacity. Tax capacity rate replaces the term mill rate. <br /> IUFARS(Uniform Financial Accounting and Reporting Standards): Rules and insu ctions <br /> adopted by the state Board of Education under Iegislative mandate to govern the methc :s by <br /> which school districts record financial transactions and inform the state department of <br /> education about their finances. <br />