Laserfiche WebLink
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes <br /> November 21, 2000 <br /> Page 4 <br /> 1 10.2 Review Engineering Comments re: Accurate Wire Solutions Proposal to Purchase City- <br /> 2 Owned Property. <br /> 3 Bergstrom reviewed for the Commission that Accurate Wire Solutions is interested in a street va- <br /> 4 cation for Anthony Lane. In.this respect, Bergstrom directed the Commission's attention to Todd <br /> 5 Hubmer's letter of November 10,2000. Mr.Hubmer's letter stated that WSB&Associates,Inc.has <br /> 6 reviewed the current request by Accurate Wire Solution for the City to vacate a portion of Anthony <br /> 7 lane right-of-way to accommodate the proposed building expansion in St. Anthony Industrial Park. <br /> 8 Mr. Hubmer's letter noted that, should the City decide to accommodate this request, the following <br /> 9 actions are recommended: (1) the right-of-way could be vacated and a utility easement could be <br /> 10 taken over that portion of the right-of-way within-which the City's watermain is located; (2) a <br /> 1 ► driveway easement could be dedicated to ensure that the property located in St. Anthony Industrial <br /> 12 Park 2nd Addition, Block .1, Lot 2, is provided access to Anthony Lane; and (3) the'proposed <br /> 13 building should meet City standards for building setbacks from the rear property line as the City' <br /> 14 watermain runs parallel to the eastern lot line. <br /> 15 Thomas suggested that if the Planning Commission did accommodate this request, besides incor- <br /> 16 porating everything that WSB suggested, the costs should also be added in. Specifically, that the <br /> 17 costs should be borne by the company. <br /> •18 11. OTHER ITEMS. <br /> 19 11.22. Review Terms to the Planning Commission. <br /> 20 Bergstrom noted that the following Commissioner's terms will expire at the end of this year: <br /> 21 Melsha, Hatch, and Bergstrom. He noted that December 1, 2000 is the deadline for submitting <br /> 22 letters of renewal. <br /> 23 11.2 Report From the Antenna Ordinance Subcommittee. <br /> 24 Melsha reported that the subcommittee met in the earlier part of November. Melsha stated that <br /> 25 Hatch had suggested that a survey be performed and some research done with the communications <br /> 26 companies. The information obtained would be to see where those companies foresee antennas <br /> 27 being placed and the technology that would be needed. The subcommittee has discussed the <br /> 28 possibility of meeting next week to formalize the information and will be working with Staff in the <br /> 29 meantime. Stille noted that Hatch had found a pertinent article on a webpage,and the-possibility had <br /> 30 been discussed about engaging a particular firm for guidance in connection with the antenna <br /> 31 ordinance. The cost of such a service was not expected to be prohibitive. <br /> 32 Bergstrom reviewed that there is a one-year moratorium on this ordinance,and he requested that the <br /> 33 subcommittee put together a type of timeline for their research as it would be helpful to the Planning <br /> 34 Commission. <br /> 35 Melsha noted that he and the other members of the subcommittee would be coordinating the project <br /> •36 with Assistant City Manager Sue Henry. <br /> 37 12. COMMISSION INPUT. <br /> 38 12.1 Commissioner's Comments. <br />