Laserfiche WebLink
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes <br /> February 18, 2003 <br /> Page 4 <br /> 1 Commissioner Tillman said it would be nice to know specifically what the State <br /> 2 regulates. <br /> 3 <br /> 4 . Commissioner Stromgren said he would be interested in knowing the State's schedule for <br /> 5 day care inspections. <br /> 6 <br /> 7 Chair Melsha asked Ms. Hall to pull the Minnesota rules for adult day care. He said it <br /> 8 would provide helpful background information, in addition to seeing how other cities <br /> 9 handle it. He suggested discussing this information at the next meeting. <br /> 10 <br /> 11 Commissioner Hanson asked if the adult day care facilities often have a registered nurse <br /> 12 on location. Mr. Strand responded that most facilities have a nurse that stops by <br /> 13 periodically, about on hour per day. <br /> 14 <br /> 15 Commissioner Hanson asked how the cost for adult day care compares to child day care. <br /> 16 Mr. Smith indicated that the cost would be about the same,but he's unsure of the <br /> 17 amount. <br /> 18 <br /> 19 Hearing no further questions, Chair Melsha moved forward with the agenda. <br /> 20 <br /> 21 8.2 Discuss Proposed Pawnbroker Ordinance. <br /> 22 Ms. Hall stated that at the December 17, 2002 Planning Commission meeting,the <br /> 23 proposed Pawnbroker Ordinance was discussed. Commissioners at that time made some <br /> 24 comments and discussed them with Chris Smith of Dorsey and Whitney. She said Mr. <br /> 25 Smith made some revisions to the proposed Pawnbroker Ordinance and is in attendance <br /> 26 for clarification and questions. She indicated that Captain John Ohl of the St. Anthony <br /> 27 Village Police Department has also reviewed the Ordinance and his comments have been <br /> 28 incorporated into the latest draft. <br /> 29 <br /> 30 Ms. Hall stated the Second Hand Goods Ordinance (which is a current City ordinance) <br /> 31 should also be discussed tonight. <br /> 32 <br /> 33 Mr. Smith stated he didn't make many changes to the Ordinance following the December <br /> 34 17, 2002 meeting. He said he made a few changes to the Pawnbroker Ordinance based <br /> 35 on the Second Hand Goods Ordinance,however,they're very similar. <br /> 36 <br /> 37 Mr. Smith reviewed the latest Pawnbroker Ordinance revisions with the Planning <br /> 38 Commission. <br /> 39 <br /> 40 Mr. Smith noted that a change was made to Section 566.11 regarding people ineligible <br /> 41 for a license. He said there was previous discussion about how to determine a person <br /> 42 was of ill repute for denying a license, therefore,more specific language was added. Mr. <br /> 43 Smith indicated that similar changes were made to Section 566.17 regarding suspension <br /> 44 or revocation of a license. <br /> 45 <br /> 46 Chair Melsha asked Mr. Smith to explain Minnesota Statute, Section 364.03 (under <br /> 47 Section 566.11)Mr. Smith stated it specifically related to public employment. He said <br />