Laserfiche WebLink
_10- <br /> Voting on the motion: <br /> Aye : Ranallo, Letourneau, Sundland, and Enrooth. <br /> Nay : Marks . <br /> Motion carried. <br /> Mr. Soth pointed. out several. areas of potential problem with the word- , <br /> ing of the proposed j.oint agreement for the fire pumper. <br /> p P . <br /> He recommended .several changes in wording in the document and indicated <br /> he would , reseakch another question about procedure with the Plymouth ... <br /> attorney before the document is signed. <br /> Motion by Councilman Marks and seconded by Councilman Enrooth to adopt .. <br /> Resolution 83-041 subject to, wokd changes recommended by the City <br /> Attorney and his clarification of procedures before the agreement is <br /> signed. <br /> RESOLUTION 83-041 <br /> A RESOLUTI ON AUTHORIZING THE. MAYOR AND CITY MANAGER <br /> TO SIGN THE JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT <br /> FOR THE PURCHASE OF FIRE APPARATUS <br /> Motion carried unanimously. <br /> .Prior to the Council meeting that evening , the Council had conducted <br /> a public hearing on the City ' s 1984 budget and tax levy and the Manager <br /> had addressed changes in the Water Department budget which had been <br /> made in his cover memorandum with the proposed resolution. <br /> Motion by Councilman Ranallo and seconded by Councilman Enrooth to <br /> adopt Resolution 83-042 . <br /> RESOLUTION 8j-042 <br /> A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE 1983 TAX LEVY, <br /> COLLECTIBLE IN 1984 AND THE 1984 CITY BUDGET <br /> Motion carried unanimously . <br /> Motion by Councilman Ranallo and seconded by Councilman Marks to <br /> approve the second reading of Ordinance 1983-005 , establishing fee <br /> charges for licenses and permit with the changes in wording recommended <br /> by the City Attorney in his letter of September 27 , 1983 . <br /> ORDINANCE 1983-005 <br /> AN ORDINANCE RELATING. TO. MISCELLANEOUS LICENSES AND PERMIT <br /> CHAilGES , P21ENDING_SECTIONS 510 AND 560 OF <br /> THE 1973.-CODE OF ORDINANCES <br /> Motion carried unanimously. <br /> A Planning Commis'sion- memb&r:- hAd raised the, question -whether the $30 <br /> proposed t'o be'�chak�ed - contractors might be' too high for some and <br /> Councilman ,Ranall6 ihdicdtedhe perceives the fee which w'ould only be- <br /> charged- once could easily .be -absorbed in the contractor's charges to ,- <br />