Laserfiche WebLink
• 1 -3- <br /> 2 Motion carried unanimously. <br /> 3 Motion by Enrooth; seconded- by Sundland to. approve payment of $1 , 061 . 00 <br /> 4 , to' the Briggs and Morgan law firm for legal .services .in conjunction with <br /> 5 the City' s law suit against the U.S. Army et al as related to St. <br /> 6 Anthony' s water contamination problems. <br /> 7 Motion carried unanimously. <br /> 8 Motion by Marks, seconded �by Makowske to approve payment of $217 . 46 to <br /> 9 Short-Elliott-Hendrickson, Inc. for the Wilson Avenue watermain plans. <br /> 10 Motion carried unanimously. <br /> 11 Motion by Makowske, seconded by Marks to approve payment of $644. 92 to <br /> 12 the Dorsey & Whitney law firm for legal services rendered during April, <br /> 13 1987 . <br /> 14 Motion carried unanimously. <br /> 15 Motion by Enrooth, seconded by Marks, to approve payment of $1 , 825 . 00 to <br /> 16 the Edward J. Hance law firm for prosecution services they had rendered <br /> 17 from May 7 through June 3 , 1987 . <br /> •18 Motion carried unanimously. <br /> 19 REPORTS <br /> 20 JUNE 16 , 1987 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - COMMISSIONER STEVE LONDON <br /> 21 Setback Variance Granted for Home Addition at 2614 - 30th Avenue N.E. <br /> 22 Application: for a 16 foot 6 inch variance from the Ordinance require- <br /> 23 ment for 30 foot front yard setbacks to allow an addition <br /> 24 to the east side of the existing house to within 13 feet <br /> 25 6 inches of the front property line. <br /> 26 There was a brief discussion of the following issues . involved in this <br /> - 27 request: <br /> 28 London -reported the Commission had recommended the Council grant <br /> 29 ' the requested variance because they perceived there was no <br /> 30 other feasible way of adding to the house; <br /> 31 -said the proposed addition would be in alignment with other <br /> 32 houses on that - side of the street except for the house next <br /> 33 door which encroached even farther into the required front <br /> 34 yard setback. <br /> .35 Enrooth -expressed some concern about the size of the variance;. <br /> 36 <br />