My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC PACKET 12131988 (2)
StAnthony
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
1988
>
CC PACKET 12131988 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2015 4:34:10 PM
Creation date
12/30/2015 4:34:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
18
SP Folder Name
CC PACKETS 1987-1989
SP Name
CC PACKET 12131988
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
75
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ai®RE th07 <br /> a s <br /> DATE : APPR OVA ti/U <br /> December 14 1988 <br /> TO : planning Commission Members <br /> ]FROM : �J <br /> David M. Childs, City Manager <br /> Z TEM : R. L. JOHNSON (OLD MEDTRONIC BUILDING) SIGN VARIANCE REQUEST <br /> This item was tabled at the last meeting to allow the applicants to <br /> submit more information about the exact location of their proposed <br /> freestanding sign and to evaluate the size of the proposed sign to see <br /> if a smaller sign would be effective. <br /> The attached map gives distance of the proposed sign from the <br /> building, roadway on Highway 88 and to Old Highway 8 on the south. It <br /> also shows the relative location of the sign with respect to the two <br /> illegal plywood signs presently at that location. <br /> The size of the proposed new sign is 9'0" X 5'411 . (This is 48 square <br /> feet per side or a total of 96 square feet. ) The previously proposed <br /> sign was 10' X 5'110-3/4" or a total of 118 square feet. This <br /> represents an approximately 20% reduction in proposed sign surface <br /> area. <br /> The new sign base is 3 feet tall for a total height of 816" whereas <br /> the previous plan was for a 6 foot base and an overall height of <br /> 11'10-3/4" . <br /> The trade off of this sign for the building signs is a good one, but I <br /> feel that it is very important that the fact that it is a trade off be <br /> in the motion to avoid any confusion in the future. <br /> :cjkl2. 20.88 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.