My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC PACKET 07311990
StAnthony
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
1990
>
CC PACKET 07311990
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2015 8:07:35 PM
Creation date
12/30/2015 8:07:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
30
SP Folder Name
CC PACKETS 1990-1994
SP Name
CC PACKET 07311990
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
72
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular Council Meeting <br /> July 10, 1990 <br /> page 12 <br /> 1 Recognizing that this facility needs a new generator, Councilmember • <br /> 2 Enrooth suggested that the remaining funds be used for the purchase <br /> 3 of a generator. The City Manager will contact Senator Marty and <br /> 4 Representative McGuire on this matter and he noted tha t the Public <br /> 5 Works Director expressed his approval of Laughlin Electric. <br /> 6 <br /> 7 Motion carried unanimously <br /> R <br /> 9 9. UNFINISHED BUSINESS <br /> 10 <br /> 11 A. Ordinance No. 1990-004; Amendment to Garbage Haulers Ordinance <br /> 12 Motion by Enrooth, second by Marks to approve the final reading and <br /> 13 adoption of Ordinance No. 1990-004, being an ordinance relating to <br /> 14 the licensing of haulers of garbage, refuse, recyclables and yard <br /> 15 waste; amending Section 530:15 of and adding a new section 530:20 <br /> 16 to the 1973 Code of Ordinances. <br /> 17 <br /> 18 Motion carried unanimously <br /> 19 <br /> 20 B. Selection of Consultants for Sanitary and Storm Sewer Diversions <br /> 21 Three firms had submitted proposals- for performing the feasibility <br /> 22 study. They are Putnam Consultants, Rieke Carrol Muller Associates, <br /> 23 Inc. and Barr Engineering Company. <br /> 24 <br /> �5 Some members of the Council expressed their concerns and reservations <br /> 26 regarding some of these firms. <br /> 27 <br /> 28 The City Manager reviewed the costs submitted with the proposals noting <br /> �9 that the quote from Barr Engineering was the least costly and that it <br /> 30 is a very large firm. <br /> 31 <br /> 32 Motion by Makowske, second by Ranallo to award the evaluation project <br /> 33 of a diversion option to Barr Engineering Company. <br /> 34 <br /> 35 Motion carried unanimously <br /> 36 <br /> 37 C. Foss Road Lift Station Update <br /> 38 It was noted there is concern with the pumps, the bubbler and the <br /> 39 well rusting. The City Manager stated that NewMech's attorney felt <br /> 40 there was nothing irregular with the bubbler functions and that the <br /> 41 well could be sanded and painted. The motor is still under warranty. <br /> 42 The City Manager indicated that the firm does not intend to pay any <br /> 43 liquidated damages which are now in the area of $150,000. <br /> 44 <br /> 49 He felt this matter is headed toward litigation and that the contract <br /> 46 law attorney is very comfortable with the City's position in the matter. <br /> 47 <br /> 48 Previously, some members of the Council had visited the site of the <br /> 49 Foss Road lift station and observed some of its operation appeared <br /> 50 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.